Participation of Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in Phase I Clinical Trials: Experience From Two National Cancer Institute–Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers

Purpose Phase I trials are intended to define the safety of novel therapeutics, yet they offer alternative options long before they are approved. Limited data exist regarding access to and participation in phase I trials among gynecologic oncology patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, toxicities, and prognostic factors of phase I trials in advanced gynecologic malignancies. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with gynecologic malignancies enrolled in phase I clinical trials at two National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers between 2000 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data were collected via chart review. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors, with multiple imputations for missing data. Results Three hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 58.8 years (standard deviation, 11.5). Most were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. The clinical benefit rate among response-evaluable patients was 56.2%, primarily driven by stable disease. The median OS was 1.16 years, with a significant improvement over time, favoring patients enrolled between 2015 and 2022, who had a median OS of 2.17 years ( P < .0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced a higher risk of mortality compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with only 3.9% experiencing dose-limiting toxicities. Conclusion Phase I clinical trial participation in gynecologic cancers may provide clinically meaningful benefits, favorable toxicity profiles, and improved median OS over time. These findings support careful consideration of integrating phase I trials into treatment paradigms and highlight the ongoing necessity to address persistent disparities in trial enrollment and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op-26-00217
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participation of Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in Phase I Clinical Trials: Experience From Two National Cancer Institute–Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers

Sanjay Goel, Anusha Adkoli, V. Shankar, Eugenia Girda et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Participation of Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in Phase I Clinical Trials: Experience From Two National Cancer Institute–Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers

Sanjay Goel, Anusha Adkoli, V. Shankar, Eugenia Girda, Radhashree Maitra, Imran Chaudhary, Meng‐Shiou Shieh, Krystle Vera, Charlotte Hadjadj, Patrick Glennan, Kevin Yeung, Mohammad Haroon Ghalib, Demmie Aguilar
article en

Abstract

Purpose Phase I trials are intended to define the safety of novel therapeutics, yet they offer alternative options long before they are approved. Limited data exist regarding access to and participation in phase I trials among gynecologic oncology patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, toxicities, and prognostic factors of phase I trials in advanced gynecologic malignancies. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with gynecologic malignancies enrolled in phase I clinical trials at two National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers between 2000 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data were collected via chart review. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors, with multiple imputations for missing data. Results Three hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 58.8 years (standard deviation, 11.5). Most were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. The clinical benefit rate among response-evaluable patients was 56.2%, primarily driven by stable disease. The median OS was 1.16 years, with a significant improvement over time, favoring patients enrolled between 2015 and 2022, who had a median OS of 2.17 years ( P < .0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced a higher risk of mortality compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with only 3.9% experiencing dose-limiting toxicities. Conclusion Phase I clinical trial participation in gynecologic cancers may provide clinically meaningful benefits, favorable toxicity profiles, and improved median OS over time. These findings support careful consideration of integrating phase I trials into treatment paradigms and highlight the ongoing necessity to address persistent disparities in trial enrollment and outcomes.

JCO Oncology Practice
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Baystate Medical Center (US), Baystate Health (US), Rutgers Cancer Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.