What is Armed Comfort?

This article introduces Armed Comfort as a distinct mode of militarized governance through which armed authority is affectively normalized in everyday civilian life. It asks why visible militarization to some is so often experienced as reassuring rather than threatening. While critical military studies have richly examined militarization through fear, coercion, surveillance, ideology, and other enriching dimensions; this article foregrounds ‘affect’ as a mechanism through which militarized power endures. This article makes three interventions. First, building upon Feminist and Critical Military Studies’ analyzes of everyday militarization, it foregrounds ‘comfort’ as a specific affective mechanism of governance through which militarized authority is normalized in civilian life. Second, it develops the concept of armed comfort and identifies its key features. Third, it demonstrates how ‘comfort’ operates as a political technology that stabilizes militarized governance in civilian life. Lastly, it engages with the ambiguities that surround this concept. The article is primarily conceptual, drawing on repeated everyday encounters in Indian public infrastructure as illustrative sites rather than formal ethnographic cases. By theorizing reassurance as politically productive, the article extends critical military studies’ engagement with everyday militarization and its affective foundations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Military Studies
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2026.2747463
Primary Topic
Military and Defense Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is Armed Comfort?

Debayan Das
Critical Military Studies
Military and Defense Studies
article

What is Armed Comfort?

Debayan Das
article en

Abstract

This article introduces Armed Comfort as a distinct mode of militarized governance through which armed authority is affectively normalized in everyday civilian life. It asks why visible militarization to some is so often experienced as reassuring rather than threatening. While critical military studies have richly examined militarization through fear, coercion, surveillance, ideology, and other enriching dimensions; this article foregrounds ‘affect’ as a mechanism through which militarized power endures. This article makes three interventions. First, building upon Feminist and Critical Military Studies’ analyzes of everyday militarization, it foregrounds ‘comfort’ as a specific affective mechanism of governance through which militarized authority is normalized in civilian life. Second, it develops the concept of armed comfort and identifies its key features. Third, it demonstrates how ‘comfort’ operates as a political technology that stabilizes militarized governance in civilian life. Lastly, it engages with the ambiguities that surround this concept. The article is primarily conceptual, drawing on repeated everyday encounters in Indian public infrastructure as illustrative sites rather than formal ethnographic cases. By theorizing reassurance as politically productive, the article extends critical military studies’ engagement with everyday militarization and its affective foundations.

Critical Military Studies
Presidency University (IN), Presidency University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Military and Defense Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.