Adipose-Derived Orthobiologics and Extracellular Vesicles in Foot and Ankle Surgery: Current Evidence and Clinical Limitations

Interest in adipose-derived orthobiologics and extracellular vesicles (EVs) has expanded as clinicians seek minimally invasive treatments for musculoskeletal disorders. However, culture-expanded adipose-derived stromal cells, stromal vascular fraction, microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), and isolated EVs are biologically and regulatorily distinct products. This narrative review summarizes their biological rationale, processing, clinical evidence, regulatory considerations, and potential application in foot and ankle surgery. Randomized studies in knee osteoarthritis suggest that MFAT may provide symptomatic improvement, but it has not consistently demonstrated superiority over other orthobiologic injections, and the certainty of evidence remains low. Preclinical EV studies provide biological plausibility for effects on tendon healing, tendon-to-bone integration, and cartilage repair. However, substantial heterogeneity in cellular source, preparation, dose, and experimental model limits translation. Human orthopaedic EV evidence remains confined to early studies in knee osteoarthritis using placental or umbilical cord derived products, with limited and conflicting evidence of efficacy and no completed studies specific to the foot and ankle. No adipose-derived regenerative medicine or EV product is Food and Drug Administration-approved for an orthopaedic indication. Current evidence therefore does not support routine clinical use or claims of tissue regeneration. Standardized product characterization and well-designed comparative trials are required to establish safety, efficacy, and appropriate clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Specialist
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400261497293
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adipose-Derived Orthobiologics and Extracellular Vesicles in Foot and Ankle Surgery: Current Evidence and Clinical Limitations

Bradley A. Lezak, Nathaniel P. Mercer, Edward S. Mojica, Samuel R. Montgomery et al.
Foot & Ankle Specialist
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Adipose-Derived Orthobiologics and Extracellular Vesicles in Foot and Ankle Surgery: Current Evidence and Clinical Limitations

Bradley A. Lezak, Nathaniel P. Mercer, Edward S. Mojica, Samuel R. Montgomery, Alexander Tham, Lefko T. Charalambous, John G. Kennedy, James J. Butler, Jared Rubin
article en

Abstract

Interest in adipose-derived orthobiologics and extracellular vesicles (EVs) has expanded as clinicians seek minimally invasive treatments for musculoskeletal disorders. However, culture-expanded adipose-derived stromal cells, stromal vascular fraction, microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), and isolated EVs are biologically and regulatorily distinct products. This narrative review summarizes their biological rationale, processing, clinical evidence, regulatory considerations, and potential application in foot and ankle surgery. Randomized studies in knee osteoarthritis suggest that MFAT may provide symptomatic improvement, but it has not consistently demonstrated superiority over other orthobiologic injections, and the certainty of evidence remains low. Preclinical EV studies provide biological plausibility for effects on tendon healing, tendon-to-bone integration, and cartilage repair. However, substantial heterogeneity in cellular source, preparation, dose, and experimental model limits translation. Human orthopaedic EV evidence remains confined to early studies in knee osteoarthritis using placental or umbilical cord derived products, with limited and conflicting evidence of efficacy and no completed studies specific to the foot and ankle. No adipose-derived regenerative medicine or EV product is Food and Drug Administration-approved for an orthopaedic indication. Current evidence therefore does not support routine clinical use or claims of tissue regeneration. Standardized product characterization and well-designed comparative trials are required to establish safety, efficacy, and appropriate clinical applications.

Foot & Ankle Specialist
NYU Langone Health (US), New York University (US), Albany Medical Center Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.