Less Close but Same Display Rules: Norms for Emotional Expression in Online and Face-to-Face Interactions

Online meetings are increasingly used for work, social, and healthcare purposes, yet their emotional quality is unclear. We tested whether differences in perceived closeness, privacy and anonymity between online and face to face (F2F) interactions alter display rules—the norms governing emotional expression. Participants from Australia (N = 1339) and the United Kingdom (N = 1298) reported display rules for online and F2F interactions with a friend, co-worker, supervisor, GP, or psychologist/counsellor. Online interactions felt less close and comfortable and more anonymous, but display rules did not differ from F2F interactions, with Bayesian analyses strongly supporting the null. Closeness and anonymity predicted display rules only in some cases. Privacy did not, suggesting earlier privacy effects may reflect other factors, such as audience size. Social anxiety was an important predictor, and display rules differed clearly between countries. These findings refine display rule theory and support online platforms for professional and healthcare interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2735496
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Less Close but Same Display Rules: Norms for Emotional Expression in Online and Face-to-Face Interactions

Nicolas Cherbuin, Amelia Gulliver, Eryn J. Newman, Amy Dawel et al.
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Digital Communication and Language
article

Less Close but Same Display Rules: Norms for Emotional Expression in Online and Face-to-Face Interactions

Nicolas Cherbuin, Amelia Gulliver, Eryn J. Newman, Amy Dawel, Yiyun Shou, Sonia M. McCallum, Conal Monaghan, Paige Mewton, Louise M. Farrer
article en

Abstract

Online meetings are increasingly used for work, social, and healthcare purposes, yet their emotional quality is unclear. We tested whether differences in perceived closeness, privacy and anonymity between online and face to face (F2F) interactions alter display rules—the norms governing emotional expression. Participants from Australia (N = 1339) and the United Kingdom (N = 1298) reported display rules for online and F2F interactions with a friend, co-worker, supervisor, GP, or psychologist/counsellor. Online interactions felt less close and comfortable and more anonymous, but display rules did not differ from F2F interactions, with Bayesian analyses strongly supporting the null. Closeness and anonymity predicted display rules only in some cases. Privacy did not, suggesting earlier privacy effects may reflect other factors, such as audience size. Social anxiety was an important predictor, and display rules differed clearly between countries. These findings refine display rule theory and support online platforms for professional and healthcare interactions.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Australian National University (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), The University of Western Australia (AU), National University Health System (SG), University of Waikato (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Less Close but Same Display Rules: Norms for Emotional Expression in Online and Face-to-Face Interactions — Nicolas Cherbuin, Amelia Gulliver, et al. · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS