Diagnostic Accuracy of VE1 Immunohistochemistry for BRAF p.V600E in Colorectal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review
Background and Objectives: BRAF p.V600E status has diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic relevance in colorectal carcinoma. Molecular assays remain the reference methods, whereas mutation-specific BRAF (VE1 clone) immunohistochemistry offers a rapid tissue-based alternative. We evaluated VE1–molecular concordance and factors affecting diagnostic performance. Materials and Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in August 2025 and updated on 27 July 2026 for English-language original studies published from 2014 through the update date. Eligible reports applied VE1 and a recognized molecular reference method to the same colorectal carcinoma specimens or a defined overlapping cohort. Study selection and data extraction were performed by one reviewer and independently verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed at the estimate level with QUADAS-3. Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed, and the findings were synthesized descriptively. Results: Of 704 database records, 358 unique records were screened; 38 full-text reports were assessed and 28 were included. Twenty-three reports or defined subcohorts provided complete or clearly reconstructible 2 × 2 comparisons. Sensitivity ranged from 74.6% to 100% and specificity from 66.7% to 100%. Most optimized protocols exceeded 90% for both measures, whereas selected sampling, weak or focal staining, post hoc thresholds, protocol effects, and selective molecular verification reduced reliability. Conclusions: VE1 immunohistochemistry may provide a rapid, locally validated triage method for detecting BRAF p.V600E in colorectal carcinoma. However, substantial heterogeneity and recurrent risk-of-bias concerns limit the generalizability of the available estimates and do not support universal substitution for molecular testing. Equivocal, technically inadequate, or clinically discordant results require molecular clarification.
Authors
- Marian Botoncea (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-4306)
- Diana Molnár
- Gabriel Serac (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7423-0023)
- Zsuzsanna Pap (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5179-5120)
- Tamás-Csaba Sipos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2249-3918)
- Marius Alexandru Beleaua (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0175-7588)
- Ovidiu-Ioan Șușu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4403-4730)
- Oana Alexandra Tăurean (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1082-4271)
- Remus-Sebastian Șipoș
Institutions
- Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș (RO)
- Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Târgu Mureş (RO)
- Spitalul Clinic Judetean Mures (RO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Medicina
- Published
- 2026-10-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62101974
- Primary Topic
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00