Structural Compactness of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Seeds in Historical and Projected Climates

Abstract We examine how the structural compactness of North Atlantic tropical cyclone (TC) seeds responds to warming in ERA5 reanalysis and CAM5 simulations. In ERA5, comparing 1985–1999 with 2000–2014, developing seeds in the later, warmer period become slightly more compact and exhibit stronger mid‐level ascent and low‐level convergence, whereas non‐developing seeds change much less. In the historical CAM5 experiment, by contrast, seed compactness and secondary circulation change little across the same two periods. Under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 forcing, CAM5 produces fewer developing seeds, more non‐developing seeds, and lower survival rates with stronger warming. However, developing seeds become less compact even as their secondary circulation strengthens, while non‐developing seeds show stronger secondary circulation but little compactness change. Compactness remains a useful discriminator of seed development, but its climate response differs substantially between ERA5 and CAM5.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026gl124707
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Compactness of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Seeds in Historical and Projected Climates

Kuan-Yu Lu, Kevin A. Reed
Geophysical Research Letters
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
article

Structural Compactness of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Seeds in Historical and Projected Climates

Kuan-Yu Lu, Kevin A. Reed
article en

Abstract

Abstract We examine how the structural compactness of North Atlantic tropical cyclone (TC) seeds responds to warming in ERA5 reanalysis and CAM5 simulations. In ERA5, comparing 1985–1999 with 2000–2014, developing seeds in the later, warmer period become slightly more compact and exhibit stronger mid‐level ascent and low‐level convergence, whereas non‐developing seeds change much less. In the historical CAM5 experiment, by contrast, seed compactness and secondary circulation change little across the same two periods. Under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 forcing, CAM5 produces fewer developing seeds, more non‐developing seeds, and lower survival rates with stronger warming. However, developing seeds become less compact even as their secondary circulation strengthens, while non‐developing seeds show stronger secondary circulation but little compactness change. Compactness remains a useful discriminator of seed development, but its climate response differs substantially between ERA5 and CAM5.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(20)
Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.