Influence of exhaust backpressure on the performance of port-fuel-injected large-bore hydrogen engines with different turbocharger configurations

Abstract The transition of large-bore internal combustion engines to hydrogen offers a pathway for decarbonizing stationary power generation. However, achieving competitive power densities with port fuel injection requires high charging pressures due to intake air displacement and lean-burn combustion. The combination of high charging requirements and low exhaust gas enthalpies constrains conventional single-stage turbocharging, necessitating alternative concepts such as multi-stage or assisted systems. Because the charging architecture directly influences in-cylinder thermodynamics, this study experimentally quantifies the impacts of exhaust backpressure on a single-cylinder large-bore hydrogen engine by comparing an unrestricted exhaust baseline with configurations emulating the backpressure of single-stage and assisted turbocharging concepts. Results indicate that applying a realistic single-stage turbocharger efficiency decreases the indicated engine efficiency by 3.7 percentage points compared to an unrestricted baseline. Emulating an electrically or mechanically assisted turbocharger setup restricted the stable operating map, reduced the maximum indicated mean effective pressure from 19.7 to 18.7 bar, and caused an indicated efficiency penalty of up to 3.1 percentage points. This highlights the fundamental trade-off: achieving the necessary boost pressure either induces a thermodynamic penalty via high exhaust backpressure or requires additional power to drive the compressor. Regarding emissions, the elevated backpressure substantially reduces nitrogen oxides at medium loads with less lean mixtures compared to the unrestricted baseline due to the increased trapping of residual gas, while causing a slight increase at low loads. At high engine loads, however, both nitrogen oxides and unburned hydrogen emissions remain unaffected by the increased backpressure. These findings demonstrate the necessity of advanced charging architectures, such as multi-stage or externally assisted systems, to optimize the efficiency of stationary hydrogen engines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Automotive and Engine Technology
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41104-026-00181-1
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of exhaust backpressure on the performance of port-fuel-injected large-bore hydrogen engines with different turbocharger configurations

Andreas Zepf, Martin Härtl, Malte Jaensch, Felina Armbruster et al.
Automotive and Engine Technology
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
article

Influence of exhaust backpressure on the performance of port-fuel-injected large-bore hydrogen engines with different turbocharger configurations

Andreas Zepf, Martin Härtl, Malte Jaensch, Felina Armbruster, Moritz Lerchner
article en

Abstract

Abstract The transition of large-bore internal combustion engines to hydrogen offers a pathway for decarbonizing stationary power generation. However, achieving competitive power densities with port fuel injection requires high charging pressures due to intake air displacement and lean-burn combustion. The combination of high charging requirements and low exhaust gas enthalpies constrains conventional single-stage turbocharging, necessitating alternative concepts such as multi-stage or assisted systems. Because the charging architecture directly influences in-cylinder thermodynamics, this study experimentally quantifies the impacts of exhaust backpressure on a single-cylinder large-bore hydrogen engine by comparing an unrestricted exhaust baseline with configurations emulating the backpressure of single-stage and assisted turbocharging concepts. Results indicate that applying a realistic single-stage turbocharger efficiency decreases the indicated engine efficiency by 3.7 percentage points compared to an unrestricted baseline. Emulating an electrically or mechanically assisted turbocharger setup restricted the stable operating map, reduced the maximum indicated mean effective pressure from 19.7 to 18.7 bar, and caused an indicated efficiency penalty of up to 3.1 percentage points. This highlights the fundamental trade-off: achieving the necessary boost pressure either induces a thermodynamic penalty via high exhaust backpressure or requires additional power to drive the compressor. Regarding emissions, the elevated backpressure substantially reduces nitrogen oxides at medium loads with less lean mixtures compared to the unrestricted baseline due to the increased trapping of residual gas, while causing a slight increase at low loads. At high engine loads, however, both nitrogen oxides and unburned hydrogen emissions remain unaffected by the increased backpressure. These findings demonstrate the necessity of advanced charging architectures, such as multi-stage or externally assisted systems, to optimize the efficiency of stationary hydrogen engines.

Automotive and Engine Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.