Teaching Informed Consent in Surgical Training: A Scoping Review

Objective There is no widely adopted, standardized approach for teaching surgical trainees how to obtain informed consent. Further, no broadly accepted standards exist to characterize the content of methods by which surgical trainees should be taught about conducting informed consent discussions. This scoping review aims to characterize and describe the currently available educational curricula designed to teach informed consent communication to surgical trainees, including medical students on surgery clerkships and surgery residents. design, setting, and participants A comprehensive search of 6 databases was performed on January 16, 2025 for relevant studies: MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, Education Source, Web of Science Core Collection, and MedEdPortal. Studies describing educational interventions to teach U.S. undergraduate medical education (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) trainees surgical informed consent were included in this review. Editorials and opinion pieces, studies conducted outside of the U.S., and those focused on continuing medical education (CME) learners were excluded. This review followed the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review framework and was reported using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results The database search yielded 4337 unique studies of which 16 met criteria for inclusion. GME trainees were the focus of interest for most studies. A wide range of teaching methods were implemented by a variety of instructors, including attending surgeons, risk management personnel, and peer educators. 56% of studies ( n = 9) reported an informed consent definition including elements of informed consent discussions they taught to trainees. 44% of studies used validated assessment tools ( n = 7) to assess interventional impact and there was no overlap of assessment tool utilization between studies. Conclusions This scoping review highlights wide variation in how informed consent is taught, assessed, and evaluated across surgical training. Future efforts should define pedagogical standards for teaching informed consent principles to surgical trainees so that they learn to communicate information in ways patients can understand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of surgical education
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104207
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Informed Consent in Surgical Training: A Scoping Review

Lauren A. Maggio, Carly G. Sobol, Leslie Christensen, Kimberly E. Kopecky et al.
Journal of surgical education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Teaching Informed Consent in Surgical Training: A Scoping Review

Lauren A. Maggio, Carly G. Sobol, Leslie Christensen, Kimberly E. Kopecky, Michael Blackie, Gabrielle Moore
article en

Abstract

Objective There is no widely adopted, standardized approach for teaching surgical trainees how to obtain informed consent. Further, no broadly accepted standards exist to characterize the content of methods by which surgical trainees should be taught about conducting informed consent discussions. This scoping review aims to characterize and describe the currently available educational curricula designed to teach informed consent communication to surgical trainees, including medical students on surgery clerkships and surgery residents. design, setting, and participants A comprehensive search of 6 databases was performed on January 16, 2025 for relevant studies: MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, Education Source, Web of Science Core Collection, and MedEdPortal. Studies describing educational interventions to teach U.S. undergraduate medical education (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) trainees surgical informed consent were included in this review. Editorials and opinion pieces, studies conducted outside of the U.S., and those focused on continuing medical education (CME) learners were excluded. This review followed the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review framework and was reported using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results The database search yielded 4337 unique studies of which 16 met criteria for inclusion. GME trainees were the focus of interest for most studies. A wide range of teaching methods were implemented by a variety of instructors, including attending surgeons, risk management personnel, and peer educators. 56% of studies ( n = 9) reported an informed consent definition including elements of informed consent discussions they taught to trainees. 44% of studies used validated assessment tools ( n = 7) to assess interventional impact and there was no overlap of assessment tool utilization between studies. Conclusions This scoping review highlights wide variation in how informed consent is taught, assessed, and evaluated across surgical training. Future efforts should define pedagogical standards for teaching informed consent principles to surgical trainees so that they learn to communicate information in ways patients can understand.

Journal of surgical educationVol. 83(11)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Augusta University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago Medical Center (US), University of Wisconsin Health (US), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.