Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence-based and pathologist scoring of murine bile duct hyperplasia

Bile duct hyperplasia in rodents, caused by chemical cytotoxicity, bile flow interference, or aging, is traditionally assessed through time-consuming microscopic examination by pathologists. We developed a deep learning-based, artificial intelligence (AI) model for quick and accurate assessment of bile duct hyperplasia in mice. The study utilized 127 hematoxylin and eosin-stained, mouse liver whole-slide images (WSIs) digitized using Aperio scanners. A segmentation algorithm with a U-Net architecture and an EfficientNet backbone was trained on 1165 areas from 35 WSIs to identify and quantify bile ducts, measure their area percentage using a supervised method, and categorize them into grades 0 to 4 using an unsupervised method. The model was validated on 24 WSIs and tested on 68 WSIs, all independently scored by 3 veterinary pathologists using consensus criteria. The segmentation model achieved Dice scores of 91.75% in training and 85.88% in validation. Testing revealed high sensitivity (95%), specificity (97%), and Dice score (95.45%), indicating robust model accuracy. Model-predicted grades showed strong correlation ( r 2 s = 0.86) with pathologists’ consensus scores. This AI-driven approach has the potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of bile duct hyperplasia assessments in rodent studies, paving the way for more standardized, objective, and high-throughput histological evaluations in preclinical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Pathology
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858261485573
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence-based and pathologist scoring of murine bile duct hyperplasia

Dinesh S. Bangari, Ingeborg Maria Langohr, Rajesh Ugalmugle, Tijo Thomas et al.
Veterinary Pathology
AI in cancer detection
article

Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence-based and pathologist scoring of murine bile duct hyperplasia

Dinesh S. Bangari, Ingeborg Maria Langohr, Rajesh Ugalmugle, Tijo Thomas, Kuldeep Gautam, Nathan Pate, Uttara Joshi, Sanjit Jha, Dayananda Siddappa, Srinivas Rao, Dev Kumar Das
article en

Abstract

Bile duct hyperplasia in rodents, caused by chemical cytotoxicity, bile flow interference, or aging, is traditionally assessed through time-consuming microscopic examination by pathologists. We developed a deep learning-based, artificial intelligence (AI) model for quick and accurate assessment of bile duct hyperplasia in mice. The study utilized 127 hematoxylin and eosin-stained, mouse liver whole-slide images (WSIs) digitized using Aperio scanners. A segmentation algorithm with a U-Net architecture and an EfficientNet backbone was trained on 1165 areas from 35 WSIs to identify and quantify bile ducts, measure their area percentage using a supervised method, and categorize them into grades 0 to 4 using an unsupervised method. The model was validated on 24 WSIs and tested on 68 WSIs, all independently scored by 3 veterinary pathologists using consensus criteria. The segmentation model achieved Dice scores of 91.75% in training and 85.88% in validation. Testing revealed high sensitivity (95%), specificity (97%), and Dice score (95.45%), indicating robust model accuracy. Model-predicted grades showed strong correlation ( r 2 s = 0.86) with pathologists’ consensus scores. This AI-driven approach has the potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of bile duct hyperplasia assessments in rodent studies, paving the way for more standardized, objective, and high-throughput histological evaluations in preclinical research.

Veterinary Pathology
Charles River Laboratories (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence-based and pathologist scoring of murine bile duct hyperplasia — Dinesh S. Bangari, Ingeborg Maria Langohr, et al. · Veterinary Pathology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS