Progression to castration-resistance and metastatic disease following androgen deprivation therapy for biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery

BACKGROUND: Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer impacts nearly one in four patients. While androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used in this setting, its impact on metastatic disease outcomes remains unclear in contemporary population-based cohorts. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using national Veterans Administration electronic health record and Central Cancer Registry data. Men undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2005-2015 were followed through 2019. We defined biochemical recurrence as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.20 nanograms/milliliter. We examined biochemically recurrent prostate cancer management and disease progression to castration-resistance and metastatic disease. RESULTS: Of 28,452 men with prostate cancer treated surgically, 7,912 (28%) developed biochemical recurrence with 10.5% developing metastatic disease (median follow up 110 months). Salvage ADT with or without radiation therapy was administered to 24% of patients. In adjusted models, salvage ADT use was associated with worse metastasis-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.96, 95% CI 1.71-2.25) and increased castration resistant therapy (aHR 20.51, 95% CI 14.48-29.04). Higher pathologic T stage, Gleason grade group, PSA, nodal involvement, and faster PSA doubling times were predictive of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: In this large national cohort of men with biochemical recurrence after surgery, most did not develop metastatic disease during nearly 10 years of follow up and one in four patients were treated with ADT. The association between ADT and adjusted outcomes likely reflects more aggressive disease among men selected for hormonal therapy. IMPACT: These findings underscore the importance of continued risk stratification refinement and management optimization for recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-26-0673
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progression to castration-resistance and metastatic disease following androgen deprivation therapy for biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery

Brent K. Hollenbeck, Ted A. Skolarus, Alexander D. Tsodikov, Gillian M. Duchesne et al.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Progression to castration-resistance and metastatic disease following androgen deprivation therapy for biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery

Brent K. Hollenbeck, Ted A. Skolarus, Alexander D. Tsodikov, Gillian M. Duchesne, Gregory Raster, Samuel N. Regan, Jordan B. Sparks, David Johnson Einstein, Jennifer Burns, Laura A. Sena, Ravi Amrit Madan, David A. Elliott, Alexander Zaslavsky, Ellen Hu, Christina Hunter Chapman, Kristian Donald Stensland, Megan E.V. Caram, Chris Barousse
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer impacts nearly one in four patients. While androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used in this setting, its impact on metastatic disease outcomes remains unclear in contemporary population-based cohorts. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using national Veterans Administration electronic health record and Central Cancer Registry data. Men undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2005-2015 were followed through 2019. We defined biochemical recurrence as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.20 nanograms/milliliter. We examined biochemically recurrent prostate cancer management and disease progression to castration-resistance and metastatic disease. RESULTS: Of 28,452 men with prostate cancer treated surgically, 7,912 (28%) developed biochemical recurrence with 10.5% developing metastatic disease (median follow up 110 months). Salvage ADT with or without radiation therapy was administered to 24% of patients. In adjusted models, salvage ADT use was associated with worse metastasis-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.96, 95% CI 1.71-2.25) and increased castration resistant therapy (aHR 20.51, 95% CI 14.48-29.04). Higher pathologic T stage, Gleason grade group, PSA, nodal involvement, and faster PSA doubling times were predictive of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: In this large national cohort of men with biochemical recurrence after surgery, most did not develop metastatic disease during nearly 10 years of follow up and one in four patients were treated with ADT. The association between ADT and adjusted outcomes likely reflects more aggressive disease among men selected for hormonal therapy. IMPACT: These findings underscore the importance of continued risk stratification refinement and management optimization for recurrent prostate cancer.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Michigan (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), University of Chicago (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), Michigan Medicine (US), Ann Arbor VA Medical Center (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Food and Drug Administration (TH), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.