Realizing the Ecological Value of Transnational Cultural Heritage Corridors: An Adaptive Governance Framework Based on the Silk Road Heritage Ecological Value Fund

Transnational cultural heritage corridors generate benefits through routes, landscapes, communities, ecological settings, and cross-border historical connections, while many conservation and environmental management responsibilities remain localized. This paper treats that mismatch as an institutional governance problem and asks how the ecological value of transnational cultural heritage corridors can be institutionally realized through adaptive governance. Here, ecological value is defined as the environmental and conservation conditions that sustain heritage places; cultural, social, and economic values are analytically distinct, although they interact with ecological value by generating benefits, legitimacy, financing opportunities, and governance demands. Methodologically, this study is a conceptual–institutional design study combining literature synthesis, document-based case grounding, prospective mechanism design, indicator construction, and illustrative institutional simulation. The Chang’an–Tianshan Corridor is examined through official UNESCO and ICOMOS documents covering 2014–2025. The proposed Silk Road Heritage Ecological Value Fund (SRHEVF) and Governance Performance Index (GPI) are therefore design prototypes rather than implemented policy instruments. The simulation uses stylized standardized inputs to compare equal, revenue-based, and responsibility-based allocation rules, as well as to assess how the mechanism behaves under conflicting indicator profiles and alternative weights. This study contributes by shifting attention from heritage value recognition to the institutional conditions required to return dispersed benefits to conservation and ecological governance, while explicitly separating conceptual design, documentary grounding, and illustrative mechanism assessment from empirical policy validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182010352
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Realizing the Ecological Value of Transnational Cultural Heritage Corridors: An Adaptive Governance Framework Based on the Silk Road Heritage Ecological Value Fund

Shaowen Zhan, Min Li, Chufan Li
Sustainability
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Realizing the Ecological Value of Transnational Cultural Heritage Corridors: An Adaptive Governance Framework Based on the Silk Road Heritage Ecological Value Fund

Shaowen Zhan, Min Li, Chufan Li
article en

Abstract

Transnational cultural heritage corridors generate benefits through routes, landscapes, communities, ecological settings, and cross-border historical connections, while many conservation and environmental management responsibilities remain localized. This paper treats that mismatch as an institutional governance problem and asks how the ecological value of transnational cultural heritage corridors can be institutionally realized through adaptive governance. Here, ecological value is defined as the environmental and conservation conditions that sustain heritage places; cultural, social, and economic values are analytically distinct, although they interact with ecological value by generating benefits, legitimacy, financing opportunities, and governance demands. Methodologically, this study is a conceptual–institutional design study combining literature synthesis, document-based case grounding, prospective mechanism design, indicator construction, and illustrative institutional simulation. The Chang’an–Tianshan Corridor is examined through official UNESCO and ICOMOS documents covering 2014–2025. The proposed Silk Road Heritage Ecological Value Fund (SRHEVF) and Governance Performance Index (GPI) are therefore design prototypes rather than implemented policy instruments. The simulation uses stylized standardized inputs to compare equal, revenue-based, and responsibility-based allocation rules, as well as to assess how the mechanism behaves under conflicting indicator profiles and alternative weights. This study contributes by shifting attention from heritage value recognition to the institutional conditions required to return dispersed benefits to conservation and ecological governance, while explicitly separating conceptual design, documentary grounding, and illustrative mechanism assessment from empirical policy validation.

SustainabilityVol. 18(20)
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (CN), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.