Fire Evacuation Safety Assessment of University Libraries Based on the Cloud Model

University libraries are critical campus venues characterized by high-density occupancy, making comprehensive fire evacuation safety assessment essential for protecting lives and cultural assets. Conventional evaluation methods often suffer from either subjective bias or a lack of engineering realism, while standalone cloud models lack robust weight allocation mechanisms. To address these deficiencies, this study proposes a fire evacuation safety evaluation method integrating combined weighting and the cloud model. An evaluation framework consisting of 21 indicators is established across four dimensions: human factors, evacuation facilities, emergency management, and venue environment. For weight determination, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the entropy method are synthesized to balance expert experience with data-driven objectivity. The cloud model is then employed to handle the inherent fuzziness and randomness in safety assessment, utilizing the forward and backward cloud generators to map qualitative linguistic descriptions to quantitative values based on three digital characteristics: expectation (Ex), entropy (En), and hyper-entropy (He). A case study of a university library in Wuhan is conducted. The results demonstrate that the library’s overall fire evacuation safety level is "Excellent," with a comprehensive cloud parameter set of (83.577, 0.620, 0.116). The assessment reveals that while evacuation facilities perform optimally, the complex architectural layout represents a structural vulnerability, and personnel safety literacy requires further stabilization. This integrated framework effectively overcomes the limitations of single-weighting strategies and provides a reliable, fine-grained quantitative tool for fire safety management and targeted risk mitigation in high-density public buildings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9100448
Primary Topic
Safety and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fire Evacuation Safety Assessment of University Libraries Based on the Cloud Model

Feizhou Huo, 许佐其, Giuseppe Vizzari, Chenrui Zhang et al.
Fire
Safety and Risk Management
article

Fire Evacuation Safety Assessment of University Libraries Based on the Cloud Model

Feizhou Huo, 许佐其, Giuseppe Vizzari, Chenrui Zhang, Zhangyu Chang, Yiping Zeng, Guohua Wu, Zhaofeng Wang, Haichuan Zhang
article en

Abstract

University libraries are critical campus venues characterized by high-density occupancy, making comprehensive fire evacuation safety assessment essential for protecting lives and cultural assets. Conventional evaluation methods often suffer from either subjective bias or a lack of engineering realism, while standalone cloud models lack robust weight allocation mechanisms. To address these deficiencies, this study proposes a fire evacuation safety evaluation method integrating combined weighting and the cloud model. An evaluation framework consisting of 21 indicators is established across four dimensions: human factors, evacuation facilities, emergency management, and venue environment. For weight determination, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the entropy method are synthesized to balance expert experience with data-driven objectivity. The cloud model is then employed to handle the inherent fuzziness and randomness in safety assessment, utilizing the forward and backward cloud generators to map qualitative linguistic descriptions to quantitative values based on three digital characteristics: expectation (Ex), entropy (En), and hyper-entropy (He). A case study of a university library in Wuhan is conducted. The results demonstrate that the library’s overall fire evacuation safety level is "Excellent," with a comprehensive cloud parameter set of (83.577, 0.620, 0.116). The assessment reveals that while evacuation facilities perform optimally, the complex architectural layout represents a structural vulnerability, and personnel safety literacy requires further stabilization. This integrated framework effectively overcomes the limitations of single-weighting strategies and provides a reliable, fine-grained quantitative tool for fire safety management and targeted risk mitigation in high-density public buildings.

FireVol. 9(10)
Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology (CN), Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN), Shenzhen Technology University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (CN), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Safety and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.