Entrepreneurial Investment Decisions in Blockchain Startups: Structured Criteria and the Provisional Moderating Role of Investor Personality

This study investigates the determinants of investors’ perceived decision-process quality, addressing a critical gap in the entrepreneurial finance literature, where blockchain ventures have been examined predominantly through speculative asset lenses rather than as entrepreneurial firms. Drawing on a sample of 51 blockchain investors, we employ partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to test a model integrating investment criteria, investor personality traits, and demographic characteristics as predictors of the Successful Investor Profile—a perceptual construct measuring perceived decision-process quality rather than realized investment success. We collected data through a structured online survey administered via Typeform. The aim of this study is to identify the determinants of the Successful Investor Profile in early-stage blockchain startups and to clarify the role of personality traits in this process. The findings show that structured investment criteria exert the dominant influence (β = 0.509, f2 = 0.649, R2 = 0.919), while personality traits show evidence of moderating rather than directly predicting outcomes, although this moderation is specification-dependent (see below). A significant interaction is observed at the position of emotional stability (β = 0.870, p = 0.002), but emotional stability is not empirically separable from conscientiousness at this sample size, so the finding is reported as dispositional conditioning of the criteria–profile relationship rather than as the effect of a named trait. This conditioning is provisional: it is not observed when the five traits are combined into a single composite personality score (interaction β = 0.018, not significant), which instead shows a significant direct effect (β = 0.312, p = 0.007) on the Successful Investor Profile, so the result should be read as specification-dependent rather than established, whereas demographic characteristics, except for investment experience duration (β = 0.275, p = 0.008), show no significant effects. We contribute to entrepreneurship theory by specifying boundary conditions for rational choice and identity economics in the blockchain context, and to practice by proposing a transparent, criterion-referenced evaluation framework for entrepreneurial venture assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative Sciences
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16100504
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entrepreneurial Investment Decisions in Blockchain Startups: Structured Criteria and the Provisional Moderating Role of Investor Personality

Andrejs Čirjevskis, Andrei Davydovitch
Administrative Sciences
Private Equity and Venture Capital
article

Entrepreneurial Investment Decisions in Blockchain Startups: Structured Criteria and the Provisional Moderating Role of Investor Personality

Andrejs Čirjevskis, Andrei Davydovitch
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of investors’ perceived decision-process quality, addressing a critical gap in the entrepreneurial finance literature, where blockchain ventures have been examined predominantly through speculative asset lenses rather than as entrepreneurial firms. Drawing on a sample of 51 blockchain investors, we employ partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to test a model integrating investment criteria, investor personality traits, and demographic characteristics as predictors of the Successful Investor Profile—a perceptual construct measuring perceived decision-process quality rather than realized investment success. We collected data through a structured online survey administered via Typeform. The aim of this study is to identify the determinants of the Successful Investor Profile in early-stage blockchain startups and to clarify the role of personality traits in this process. The findings show that structured investment criteria exert the dominant influence (β = 0.509, f2 = 0.649, R2 = 0.919), while personality traits show evidence of moderating rather than directly predicting outcomes, although this moderation is specification-dependent (see below). A significant interaction is observed at the position of emotional stability (β = 0.870, p = 0.002), but emotional stability is not empirically separable from conscientiousness at this sample size, so the finding is reported as dispositional conditioning of the criteria–profile relationship rather than as the effect of a named trait. This conditioning is provisional: it is not observed when the five traits are combined into a single composite personality score (interaction β = 0.018, not significant), which instead shows a significant direct effect (β = 0.312, p = 0.007) on the Successful Investor Profile, so the result should be read as specification-dependent rather than established, whereas demographic characteristics, except for investment experience duration (β = 0.275, p = 0.008), show no significant effects. We contribute to entrepreneurship theory by specifying boundary conditions for rational choice and identity economics in the blockchain context, and to practice by proposing a transparent, criterion-referenced evaluation framework for entrepreneurial venture assessment.

Administrative SciencesVol. 16(10)
RISEBA University of Applied Sciences (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.