Neurodiversity Before the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

We review the role of the treaty bodies in the UN system to demonstrate their potential in protecting human rights. We then discuss the disability rights and justice movement and the subsequent movement for neurodiversity rights to foreground the core issues that emerge in the discussion of communications before the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We identify core tenants of the neurodiversity movement that are central to the decisions of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We then discuss the cases brought by neurodivergent petitioners. Our focus here is on the ability of the CRPD to receive individual complaints from people in ratifying states who believe that their rights arising out of the treaty have been violated. These individual complaints brought by individuals against their governments in an international venue can serve as a catalyst to pressure states to make significant changes in their domestic human rights practices. We conclude with our analysis of the potential impact of the CRPD and suggestions for future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Societies
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16100341
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurodiversity Before the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Heather Smith-Cannoy, Charles Anthony Smith
Societies
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Neurodiversity Before the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Heather Smith-Cannoy, Charles Anthony Smith
article en

Abstract

We review the role of the treaty bodies in the UN system to demonstrate their potential in protecting human rights. We then discuss the disability rights and justice movement and the subsequent movement for neurodiversity rights to foreground the core issues that emerge in the discussion of communications before the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We identify core tenants of the neurodiversity movement that are central to the decisions of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We then discuss the cases brought by neurodivergent petitioners. Our focus here is on the ability of the CRPD to receive individual complaints from people in ratifying states who believe that their rights arising out of the treaty have been violated. These individual complaints brought by individuals against their governments in an international venue can serve as a catalyst to pressure states to make significant changes in their domestic human rights practices. We conclude with our analysis of the potential impact of the CRPD and suggestions for future work.

SocietiesVol. 16(10)
University of California, Irvine (US), Irvine University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.