Cost-effectiveness analysis of metformin-based combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin

This research aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of type 2 diabetes millitus (T2DM) therapy regimens based on metformin-dual therapy. This was a retrospective cohort study using medical records and billing data from T2DM patients. Study samples were chosen using consecutive sampling, including those aged 18 or older with type 2 diabetes with metformin combined with sulfonylurea, acarbose, or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i); those with incomplete medical or financial records were excluded. The incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) analysis showed that the metformin–sulfonylurea regimen was dominant, offering lower costs and greater effectiveness. Meanwhile, metformin–DPP4i demonstrated higher effectiveness than metformin–acarbose (ICER: IDR. 24,055,460 per unit increase in the proportion of controlled patients) and may serve as a therapeutic alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science, Engineering and Health Studies
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69598/sehs.20.26050018
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of metformin-based combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin

I Kadek Suardiana, Tuangrat Phodha, Dwi Endarti
Science, Engineering and Health Studies
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of metformin-based combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin

I Kadek Suardiana, Tuangrat Phodha, Dwi Endarti
article en

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of type 2 diabetes millitus (T2DM) therapy regimens based on metformin-dual therapy. This was a retrospective cohort study using medical records and billing data from T2DM patients. Study samples were chosen using consecutive sampling, including those aged 18 or older with type 2 diabetes with metformin combined with sulfonylurea, acarbose, or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i); those with incomplete medical or financial records were excluded. The incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) analysis showed that the metformin–sulfonylurea regimen was dominant, offering lower costs and greater effectiveness. Meanwhile, metformin–DPP4i demonstrated higher effectiveness than metformin–acarbose (ICER: IDR. 24,055,460 per unit increase in the proportion of controlled patients) and may serve as a therapeutic alternative.

Science, Engineering and Health Studies
Thammasat University (TH), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of metformin-based combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin — I Kadek Suardiana, Tuangrat Phodha, et al. · Science, Engineering and Health Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS