Comparative Effectiveness of Phenobarbital vs Diazepam for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome

Importance Phenobarbital use for alcohol withdrawal syndrome is increasing, but its effectiveness and safety have largely been compared with lorazepam rather than against more pharmacokinetically similar long-acting, self-tapering benzodiazepines such as diazepam. Objective To emulate a clinical trial comparing patients randomized to phenobarbital vs diazepam for alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter comparative effectiveness research study analyzed data from the Premier Healthcare Database (October 2022 to August 2024), representing 754 US acute care hospitals. Adult inpatients with a primary diagnosis of alcohol withdrawal syndrome present on admission who initiated phenobarbital or diazepam on the day of hospital admission were included. Exposures Initiation of phenobarbital or diazepam on the day of hospital admission. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary effectiveness outcome was hospital length of stay in days. The primary safety outcome was invasive mechanical ventilation use. Secondary outcomes assessed treatment escalation, complications of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome, and resource utilization. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation with ensemble machine learning was used to estimate marginal mean differences and risk differences between exposure groups. Results Among 24 643 patients (median [IQR] age, 45 [35-56] years; 18 511 male [75.1%]), 11 919 (48.4%) received phenobarbital and 12 724 (51.6%) received diazepam on the day of admission. There were no differences in hospital length of stay (marginal mean, 4.1 vs 4.3 days; marginal mean difference, −0.21 [95% CI, −0.42 to 0.00] days) or invasive mechanical ventilation use (marginal risk, 3.1% vs 2.7%; marginal risk difference, 0.4% [95% CI, −0.7% to 1.4%]) between initiation of phenobarbital vs diazepam. Secondary outcomes were also not different between phenobarbital and diazepam, except for self-directed discharge, which was more frequent among those initiated on diazepam (marginal risk, 9.5% vs 12.6%; marginal risk difference, −3.1% [95% CI, −4.9% to −1.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter study of patients hospitalized for alcohol withdrawal syndrome, there were no differences in hospital length of stay or the need for invasive mechanical ventilation between initiation of phenobarbital vs diazepam. These results may suggest near therapeutic equivalence between phenobarbital and long-acting benzodiazepines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.4939
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Phenobarbital vs Diazepam for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome

Anica C. Law, Allan J. Walkey, Kathryn L. Fantasia, Alyssa F. Peterkin et al.
1 citations
JAMA Internal Medicine
Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
4.20
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Phenobarbital vs Diazepam for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome

Anica C. Law, Allan J. Walkey, Kathryn L. Fantasia, Alyssa F. Peterkin, Megan E. Feeney, Nicholas A. Bosch, Tess Bradley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Importance Phenobarbital use for alcohol withdrawal syndrome is increasing, but its effectiveness and safety have largely been compared with lorazepam rather than against more pharmacokinetically similar long-acting, self-tapering benzodiazepines such as diazepam. Objective To emulate a clinical trial comparing patients randomized to phenobarbital vs diazepam for alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter comparative effectiveness research study analyzed data from the Premier Healthcare Database (October 2022 to August 2024), representing 754 US acute care hospitals. Adult inpatients with a primary diagnosis of alcohol withdrawal syndrome present on admission who initiated phenobarbital or diazepam on the day of hospital admission were included. Exposures Initiation of phenobarbital or diazepam on the day of hospital admission. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary effectiveness outcome was hospital length of stay in days. The primary safety outcome was invasive mechanical ventilation use. Secondary outcomes assessed treatment escalation, complications of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome, and resource utilization. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation with ensemble machine learning was used to estimate marginal mean differences and risk differences between exposure groups. Results Among 24 643 patients (median [IQR] age, 45 [35-56] years; 18 511 male [75.1%]), 11 919 (48.4%) received phenobarbital and 12 724 (51.6%) received diazepam on the day of admission. There were no differences in hospital length of stay (marginal mean, 4.1 vs 4.3 days; marginal mean difference, −0.21 [95% CI, −0.42 to 0.00] days) or invasive mechanical ventilation use (marginal risk, 3.1% vs 2.7%; marginal risk difference, 0.4% [95% CI, −0.7% to 1.4%]) between initiation of phenobarbital vs diazepam. Secondary outcomes were also not different between phenobarbital and diazepam, except for self-directed discharge, which was more frequent among those initiated on diazepam (marginal risk, 9.5% vs 12.6%; marginal risk difference, −3.1% [95% CI, −4.9% to −1.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter study of patients hospitalized for alcohol withdrawal syndrome, there were no differences in hospital length of stay or the need for invasive mechanical ventilation between initiation of phenobarbital vs diazepam. These results may suggest near therapeutic equivalence between phenobarbital and long-acting benzodiazepines.

JAMA Internal Medicine
Boston Medical Center (US), UMass Memorial Health Care (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), UMass Memorial Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.