Association Between Early Pain and Miniscrew-Related Oral Impact After Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Evidence integrating patient-reported outcomes with the clinical performance of orthodontic miniscrews remains limited. This study evaluated pain, miniscrew-related oral impact, and six-month clinical outcomes following miniscrew placement. Methods: In this single-centre prospective observational cohort, 111 patients were screened, 104 were enrolled, and 100 patients receiving 270 clinically indicated miniscrews contributed complete data. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale immediately after placement, at 24 h, and at one week. A preliminary eight-item miniscrew-related oral-impact questionnaire was completed at one week. Analyses included the Friedman test with Holm-adjusted pairwise comparisons, Spearman correlations, and logistic generalised estimating equations (GEEs) accounting for within-patient clustering. Results: Median pain decreased from 6.0 (IQR, 3–8) immediately after placement to 4.0 (IQR, 0–7.25) at 24 h and 0.0 (IQR, 0–2) at one week (p < 0.001; Kendall’s W = 0.568; pairwise r = 0.366–0.758). Analgesics were used by 57% of participants. The mean oral-impact score was 6.08 ± 5.92 on a 0–32 scale. Greater immediate post-placement pain was associated with higher oral-impact scores (ρ = 0.431; p < 0.001). At six months, 250 of 270 miniscrews were successful (92.6%). At the miniscrew level, soft-tissue injury and localised inflammation affected 7.8% and 4.4%, respectively. No examined factor was reliably associated with failure in the clustered GEE model. At the patient level, 78% were satisfied or very satisfied, and 92% would recommend the procedure. Conclusions: Pain decreased substantially within one week, while greater early pain was associated with less favourable oral-impact scores. A 92.6% six-month success rate and favourable patient acceptance were observed. The questionnaire requires further validation, and the exploratory failure estimates require confirmation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15207852
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between Early Pain and Miniscrew-Related Oral Impact After Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement: A Prospective Cohort Study

Hadi Mohmmad Ismail
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Association Between Early Pain and Miniscrew-Related Oral Impact After Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement: A Prospective Cohort Study

Hadi Mohmmad Ismail
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Evidence integrating patient-reported outcomes with the clinical performance of orthodontic miniscrews remains limited. This study evaluated pain, miniscrew-related oral impact, and six-month clinical outcomes following miniscrew placement. Methods: In this single-centre prospective observational cohort, 111 patients were screened, 104 were enrolled, and 100 patients receiving 270 clinically indicated miniscrews contributed complete data. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale immediately after placement, at 24 h, and at one week. A preliminary eight-item miniscrew-related oral-impact questionnaire was completed at one week. Analyses included the Friedman test with Holm-adjusted pairwise comparisons, Spearman correlations, and logistic generalised estimating equations (GEEs) accounting for within-patient clustering. Results: Median pain decreased from 6.0 (IQR, 3–8) immediately after placement to 4.0 (IQR, 0–7.25) at 24 h and 0.0 (IQR, 0–2) at one week (p < 0.001; Kendall’s W = 0.568; pairwise r = 0.366–0.758). Analgesics were used by 57% of participants. The mean oral-impact score was 6.08 ± 5.92 on a 0–32 scale. Greater immediate post-placement pain was associated with higher oral-impact scores (ρ = 0.431; p < 0.001). At six months, 250 of 270 miniscrews were successful (92.6%). At the miniscrew level, soft-tissue injury and localised inflammation affected 7.8% and 4.4%, respectively. No examined factor was reliably associated with failure in the clustered GEE model. At the patient level, 78% were satisfied or very satisfied, and 92% would recommend the procedure. Conclusions: Pain decreased substantially within one week, while greater early pain was associated with less favourable oral-impact scores. A 92.6% six-month success rate and favourable patient acceptance were observed. The questionnaire requires further validation, and the exploratory failure estimates require confirmation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(20)
University of Sulaimani (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.