Think Faster, Argue Smarter: Combining GenAI-Assisted Prep and Human-Centered Rebuttals to Enhance Critical Thinking in Structured Debates

This experiential exercise adapts the traditional Oxford-style debate format to channel the pervasive student usage of Generative AI (GenAI) into a productive tension, inviting students to sharpen their critical reasoning, rhetorical discernment, and real-time argumentation skills. Students use GenAI to help them develop initial arguments and counterarguments, then engage in real-time rebuttals where they must think independently, respond to novel challenges, and adapt beyond their GenAI-prepared materials. This approach transforms GenAI from a potential crutch into a pedagogical catalyst that reveals the irreplaceable value of audience engagement, human judgment, critical thinking, and adaptive reasoning. The exercise forces students to scrutinize reasoning (both GenAI’s and their own) against standards of logic, clarity, and relevance, by confronting GenAI-assisted arguments and then dealing with spontaneous counterarguments. The exercise has been implemented in undergraduate strategic management and business ethics classes. It can also be valuable for higher-level courses and for other course subjects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Teaching Review
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981261486426
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Think Faster, Argue Smarter: Combining GenAI-Assisted Prep and Human-Centered Rebuttals to Enhance Critical Thinking in Structured Debates

Antoaneta P. Petkova, Sally Baack, Geoffrey Desa, Robert Lee Bonner
Management Teaching Review
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Think Faster, Argue Smarter: Combining GenAI-Assisted Prep and Human-Centered Rebuttals to Enhance Critical Thinking in Structured Debates

Antoaneta P. Petkova, Sally Baack, Geoffrey Desa, Robert Lee Bonner
article en

Abstract

This experiential exercise adapts the traditional Oxford-style debate format to channel the pervasive student usage of Generative AI (GenAI) into a productive tension, inviting students to sharpen their critical reasoning, rhetorical discernment, and real-time argumentation skills. Students use GenAI to help them develop initial arguments and counterarguments, then engage in real-time rebuttals where they must think independently, respond to novel challenges, and adapt beyond their GenAI-prepared materials. This approach transforms GenAI from a potential crutch into a pedagogical catalyst that reveals the irreplaceable value of audience engagement, human judgment, critical thinking, and adaptive reasoning. The exercise forces students to scrutinize reasoning (both GenAI’s and their own) against standards of logic, clarity, and relevance, by confronting GenAI-assisted arguments and then dealing with spontaneous counterarguments. The exercise has been implemented in undergraduate strategic management and business ethics classes. It can also be valuable for higher-level courses and for other course subjects.

Management Teaching Review
San Francisco State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Think Faster, Argue Smarter: Combining GenAI-Assisted Prep and Human-Centered Rebuttals to Enhance Critical Thinking in Structured Debates — Antoaneta P. Petkova, Sally Baack, et al. · Management Teaching Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS