Toward routine implementation of phage testing: an inter-laboratory comparison of a disk-based susceptibility testing (Disk-PST)

ABSTRACT In the context of an emerging post-antibiotic era, phage therapy is gaining increasing attention. Standardized approaches for phage susceptibility testing (PST) are crucial to enable objective and effective phage selection for personalized treatment, yet no standardized reference method currently exists. To overcome this impediment, a standardized disk-based PST protocol was validated in-house (intra-laboratory comparison) involving 28 participants, followed by an inter-laboratory comparison across 12 laboratories in Germany with 39 participants. Preselection testing revealed high concordance between Disk-PST and Spot test, supporting the selection of strains with consistent phage susceptibility profiles for the interlaboratory comparison. An Escherichia coli phage, a Staphylococcus epidermidis phage, and a negative control (SM buffer) were tested on four bacterial strains (two E. coli and two S . epidermidis strains). Testing was blinded and included two technical and two biological replicates per condition. The plaque assay was performed at the coordinating laboratory (University Medical Center Rostock) and served as the reference standard. The in-house validation showed high reliability and strong agreement with the plaque assay, requiring only minor methodological adjustments prior to the inter-laboratory trial. The inter-laboratory comparison confirmed the robustness of the method, showing almost perfect agreement with the plaque assay across all participating laboratories. In the rare event of false-positive or inconclusive results, phage cross-contamination, misinterpretation of microcolonies within lysis zones, and limited information on negative controls due to the blinded test setting were causative. In accordance with its high inter-laboratory reliability, the PST-disk method seems to be highly suitable for easy implementation in routine laboratory settings. Further investigations are necessary to correlate phage test results with clinical therapy outcomes—an issue that should be addressed in future clinical trials. IMPORTANCE The rapid global spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria has intensified the need for effective alternative therapeutic strategies, including bacteriophage therapy. Because phage activity is highly strain-specific, accurate and standardized phage susceptibility testing (PST) is essential for safe and effective clinical implementation, yet standardized protocols are currently lacking. In this nationwide, blinded inter-laboratory study, we evaluated a routine-diagnostic–adapted single-disk PST method and demonstrated its excellent agreement with the gold-standard double agar layer plaque assay. Importantly, this approach represents a significant improvement over existing PST methods by providing a standardized, reproducible, and easy-to-implement assay with high potential for widespread application in clinical routine microbiology laboratories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00029-26
Primary Topic
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward routine implementation of phage testing: an inter-laboratory comparison of a disk-based susceptibility testing (Disk-PST)

Franka Lestin-Bernstein, Stefanie Deinhardt‐Emmer, Johannes K.‐M. Knobloch, Anna Trimborn et al.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
article

Toward routine implementation of phage testing: an inter-laboratory comparison of a disk-based susceptibility testing (Disk-PST)

Franka Lestin-Bernstein, Stefanie Deinhardt‐Emmer, Johannes K.‐M. Knobloch, Anna Trimborn, Johannes Elias, Romy Skusa, Philipp Warnke, Andreas Hahn, Isabell Ramming, Andreas Podbielski, Katharina Wegner, W. Splettstoesser, M. Wietzke, J. Landtag, L. Scharnagl, J. Färber, F. Szabados
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the context of an emerging post-antibiotic era, phage therapy is gaining increasing attention. Standardized approaches for phage susceptibility testing (PST) are crucial to enable objective and effective phage selection for personalized treatment, yet no standardized reference method currently exists. To overcome this impediment, a standardized disk-based PST protocol was validated in-house (intra-laboratory comparison) involving 28 participants, followed by an inter-laboratory comparison across 12 laboratories in Germany with 39 participants. Preselection testing revealed high concordance between Disk-PST and Spot test, supporting the selection of strains with consistent phage susceptibility profiles for the interlaboratory comparison. An Escherichia coli phage, a Staphylococcus epidermidis phage, and a negative control (SM buffer) were tested on four bacterial strains (two E. coli and two S . epidermidis strains). Testing was blinded and included two technical and two biological replicates per condition. The plaque assay was performed at the coordinating laboratory (University Medical Center Rostock) and served as the reference standard. The in-house validation showed high reliability and strong agreement with the plaque assay, requiring only minor methodological adjustments prior to the inter-laboratory trial. The inter-laboratory comparison confirmed the robustness of the method, showing almost perfect agreement with the plaque assay across all participating laboratories. In the rare event of false-positive or inconclusive results, phage cross-contamination, misinterpretation of microcolonies within lysis zones, and limited information on negative controls due to the blinded test setting were causative. In accordance with its high inter-laboratory reliability, the PST-disk method seems to be highly suitable for easy implementation in routine laboratory settings. Further investigations are necessary to correlate phage test results with clinical therapy outcomes—an issue that should be addressed in future clinical trials. IMPORTANCE The rapid global spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria has intensified the need for effective alternative therapeutic strategies, including bacteriophage therapy. Because phage activity is highly strain-specific, accurate and standardized phage susceptibility testing (PST) is essential for safe and effective clinical implementation, yet standardized protocols are currently lacking. In this nationwide, blinded inter-laboratory study, we evaluated a routine-diagnostic–adapted single-disk PST method and demonstrated its excellent agreement with the gold-standard double agar layer plaque assay. Importantly, this approach represents a significant improvement over existing PST methods by providing a standardized, reproducible, and easy-to-implement assay with high potential for widespread application in clinical routine microbiology laboratories.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Universität Hamburg (DE), Osnabrück University (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Würzburg (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Biologie Labor (CH), Health Affairs (US), Jena University Hospital (DE), Klinikum Osnabrück (DE), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (CH), Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene (DE), Hochschule Osnabrück (DE), HMU Potsdam – Health and Medical University Potsdam (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.