Development and Internal Validation of the BRICS Score: A Preoperative Clinical and Hematological Model for Predicting High-Grade and Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Background/Objectives: We developed and internally validated the Bladder Risk Index using Clinical and Systemic biomarkers (BRICS), a preoperative prediction model designed to estimate the likelihood of high-grade (HG) disease and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in patients undergoing their first transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 161 patients with newly diagnosed urothelial bladder cancer. The BRICS-HG model included tumor size, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and creatinine-to-hemoglobin ratio (CHR), while the BRICS-MIBC model was based on tumor size and NLR. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and Brier score, together with exploratory decision curve analysis. Internal validation was performed using 2000 bootstrap resamples. Results: MIBC was identified in 20 patients (12.4%). BRICS-HG demonstrated limited discriminatory ability, with an apparent AUC of 0.649 and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.623 (95% bootstrap interval: 0.541–0.703). BRICS-MIBC achieved moderate discrimination, with an apparent AUC of 0.735 and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.709 (95% bootstrap interval: 0.588–0.826). Across the bootstrap resamples, the model combining tumor size and NLR was selected in 53.9% of cases, reflecting uncertainty in predictor selection. Conclusions: BRICS-HG should be regarded as an exploratory model, and its current performance does not support clinical application. BRICS-MIBC demonstrated moderate discrimination after internal validation; however, its performance should be interpreted cautiously given the small number of MIBC events. Validation in larger, independent cohorts, ideally across multiple centers, is necessary before the model can be considered for clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18203282
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Internal Validation of the BRICS Score: A Preoperative Clinical and Hematological Model for Predicting High-Grade and Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Ciprian Todea-Moga, Septimiu Toader Voidăzan, Veronica Maria Ghirca, Daniel Porav-Hodade et al.
Cancers
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Development and Internal Validation of the BRICS Score: A Preoperative Clinical and Hematological Model for Predicting High-Grade and Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Ciprian Todea-Moga, Septimiu Toader Voidăzan, Veronica Maria Ghirca, Daniel Porav-Hodade, O. Vida, O. Mártha, Raul Dumitru Gherasim, Calin Bogdan Chibelean, Tibor Lóránd Reman, Rareș-Florin Vascul
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: We developed and internally validated the Bladder Risk Index using Clinical and Systemic biomarkers (BRICS), a preoperative prediction model designed to estimate the likelihood of high-grade (HG) disease and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in patients undergoing their first transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 161 patients with newly diagnosed urothelial bladder cancer. The BRICS-HG model included tumor size, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and creatinine-to-hemoglobin ratio (CHR), while the BRICS-MIBC model was based on tumor size and NLR. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and Brier score, together with exploratory decision curve analysis. Internal validation was performed using 2000 bootstrap resamples. Results: MIBC was identified in 20 patients (12.4%). BRICS-HG demonstrated limited discriminatory ability, with an apparent AUC of 0.649 and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.623 (95% bootstrap interval: 0.541–0.703). BRICS-MIBC achieved moderate discrimination, with an apparent AUC of 0.735 and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.709 (95% bootstrap interval: 0.588–0.826). Across the bootstrap resamples, the model combining tumor size and NLR was selected in 53.9% of cases, reflecting uncertainty in predictor selection. Conclusions: BRICS-HG should be regarded as an exploratory model, and its current performance does not support clinical application. BRICS-MIBC demonstrated moderate discrimination after internal validation; however, its performance should be interpreted cautiously given the small number of MIBC events. Validation in larger, independent cohorts, ideally across multiple centers, is necessary before the model can be considered for clinical implementation.

CancersVol. 18(20)
Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș (RO), Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Târgu Mureş (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.