Native Collagen Preservation Versus Exogenous Collagen Addition in Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes for Dental Regeneration: Effects of Processing on Crystallinity, Remodeling, and Graft Persistence

Xenogeneic bone substitutes are widely used in dental regeneration, yet materials commonly described as collagen-containing or collagenated may differ fundamentally in their composition and biological behavior. This narrative review examines xenografts from the perspective of their manufacturing process, focusing on the distinction between preservation of native bone collagen and addition of exogenous collagen after depro-teinization. Thermal processing progressively removes the native organic matrix and carbonate components and, particularly at higher temperatures, increases mineral crystallinity and promotes the transformation of bone into a more ceramic-like scaffold. Such materials are highly osteoconductive but may exhibit very slow resorption and long-term particle persistence. Exogenous collagen can subsequently be incorporated into the processed mineral scaffold to improve cohesion, handling, and adaptation, but does not restore the original hierarchical mineral–collagen architecture. Conversely, chemical or enzymatic processing may preserve native collagen together with a less extensively transformed mineral phase. Available preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that some native-collagen-preserving xenografts may undergo greater biological turnover and progressive replacement than highly processed anorganic comparators, although differences in animal source, porosity, mineral structure, and manufacturing protocols preclude attributing these effects exclusively to collagen preservation. We therefore propose distinguishing native-collagen-preserving xenografts (NCP-XG) from exoge-nous-collagen-supplemented xenografts (ECS-XG). This processing-based framework may provide a more biologically meaningful interpretation of collagen-containing xenografts and highlights the need to select biomaterials according to the desired balance between scaffold persistence, dimensional stability, and biological replacement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19214681
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Native Collagen Preservation Versus Exogenous Collagen Addition in Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes for Dental Regeneration: Effects of Processing on Crystallinity, Remodeling, and Graft Persistence

Chiara Cinquini, Nicola Alberto Valente, Claudia Pileri, Federica Monni et al.
2 links
Materials
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Native Collagen Preservation Versus Exogenous Collagen Addition in Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes for Dental Regeneration: Effects of Processing on Crystallinity, Remodeling, and Graft Persistence

Chiara Cinquini, Nicola Alberto Valente, Claudia Pileri, Federica Monni, Manfredi Grassadonia
article en

Abstract

Xenogeneic bone substitutes are widely used in dental regeneration, yet materials commonly described as collagen-containing or collagenated may differ fundamentally in their composition and biological behavior. This narrative review examines xenografts from the perspective of their manufacturing process, focusing on the distinction between preservation of native bone collagen and addition of exogenous collagen after depro-teinization. Thermal processing progressively removes the native organic matrix and carbonate components and, particularly at higher temperatures, increases mineral crystallinity and promotes the transformation of bone into a more ceramic-like scaffold. Such materials are highly osteoconductive but may exhibit very slow resorption and long-term particle persistence. Exogenous collagen can subsequently be incorporated into the processed mineral scaffold to improve cohesion, handling, and adaptation, but does not restore the original hierarchical mineral–collagen architecture. Conversely, chemical or enzymatic processing may preserve native collagen together with a less extensively transformed mineral phase. Available preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that some native-collagen-preserving xenografts may undergo greater biological turnover and progressive replacement than highly processed anorganic comparators, although differences in animal source, porosity, mineral structure, and manufacturing protocols preclude attributing these effects exclusively to collagen preservation. We therefore propose distinguishing native-collagen-preserving xenografts (NCP-XG) from exoge-nous-collagen-supplemented xenografts (ECS-XG). This processing-based framework may provide a more biologically meaningful interpretation of collagen-containing xenografts and highlights the need to select biomaterials according to the desired balance between scaffold persistence, dimensional stability, and biological replacement.

MaterialsVol. 19(21)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon