Mid-term clinical outcomes of one and two patient-specific mini-implants for focal (osteo-)chondral lesions of the distal femur

OBJECTIVES: Patient-specific mini-metal implants may represent a treatment option for middle-aged patients with focal (osteo-)chondral lesions of the distal femur when biological repair has failed or when other individual risk factors make biological repair unlikely to succeed. Both single-implant approaches for one- and dual-implant approaches for two separate lesions in the same knee were investigated. This study evaluates the clinical performance of these implants for one or two lesions in one knee. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was conducted using prospectively collected data of consecutive patients treated with one or two implants (Episealer Implant) with a mean follow-up of 38 months. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, adverse events, and conversions to unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty were assessed. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in all KOOS subscales and VAS pain score compared to the preoperative values were observed in both groups (one implant n = 45; two implants n = 48; all p < 0.001). KOOS symptoms improved from 48.7 ± 17.9 to 74.3 ± 21.6 in the one-implant group and from 44.7 ± 15.0 to 66.0 ± 24.8 in the two-implant group. Similar improvements were observed across all remaining KOOS subscales. The comparison between the two groups revealed slightly better improvements for the one-implant group. Implant survival according to Kaplan-Meier analysis was 88.1% for the one-implant group (number at risk = 21) and 83.4% for the two-implant group (number at risk = 27) after 60 months. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific mini-metal implants may represent a viable treatment option for middle-aged patients when biological repair is not feasible. Within the limitations of this study, the findings suggest that this approach can be considered for patients with one as well as patients with two (osteo-)chondral lesions. An acceptable implant survival was observed, regardless of lesion count. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2026.101234
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mid-term clinical outcomes of one and two patient-specific mini-implants for focal (osteo-)chondral lesions of the distal femur

Daniel Aaron den Toom, Clemens Kösters, Malte Leo Rüter
1 links
Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Mid-term clinical outcomes of one and two patient-specific mini-implants for focal (osteo-)chondral lesions of the distal femur

Daniel Aaron den Toom, Clemens Kösters, Malte Leo Rüter
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patient-specific mini-metal implants may represent a treatment option for middle-aged patients with focal (osteo-)chondral lesions of the distal femur when biological repair has failed or when other individual risk factors make biological repair unlikely to succeed. Both single-implant approaches for one- and dual-implant approaches for two separate lesions in the same knee were investigated. This study evaluates the clinical performance of these implants for one or two lesions in one knee. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was conducted using prospectively collected data of consecutive patients treated with one or two implants (Episealer Implant) with a mean follow-up of 38 months. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, adverse events, and conversions to unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty were assessed. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in all KOOS subscales and VAS pain score compared to the preoperative values were observed in both groups (one implant n = 45; two implants n = 48; all p < 0.001). KOOS symptoms improved from 48.7 ± 17.9 to 74.3 ± 21.6 in the one-implant group and from 44.7 ± 15.0 to 66.0 ± 24.8 in the two-implant group. Similar improvements were observed across all remaining KOOS subscales. The comparison between the two groups revealed slightly better improvements for the one-implant group. Implant survival according to Kaplan-Meier analysis was 88.1% for the one-implant group (number at risk = 21) and 83.4% for the two-implant group (number at risk = 27) after 60 months. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific mini-metal implants may represent a viable treatment option for middle-aged patients when biological repair is not feasible. Within the limitations of this study, the findings suggest that this approach can be considered for patients with one as well as patients with two (osteo-)chondral lesions. An acceptable implant survival was observed, regardless of lesion count. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports MedicineVol. 21
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon