Educational Materials for Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Theory-Driven Approach

BACKGROUND: To make informed choices in health-related discrete choice experiments (DCEs), respondents need to understand the choice scenarios, alternatives, attributes and attribute levels presented to them. Respondent populations are often highly diverse in knowledge and experience, leading to varying informational needs that make it challenging to design educational materials that sufficiently inform all respondents without disengaging others. At present, however, structured guidance on developing DCE educational materials is lacking. Drawing on the instructional design literature, this paper investigates whether theory-driven adaptations to educational materials improve respondent comprehension and engagement in health-related DCEs. METHODS: Informed by three focus groups on DCE informational needs, we identified four design principles from the instructional design literature relevant to DCE educational materials: whole-task instruction, making inferences explicit, adapting information to respondents' prior knowledge and embedding self-check questions with corrective feedback. Educational materials for three existing DCEs (influenza vaccination, colorectal cancer screening and rheumatoid arthritis prevention) were redesigned to incorporate these principles. Panel respondents (N = 1754) were randomized to receive either the original or the adapted educational materials, and effects on comprehension, engagement, internal validity and choice consistency were assessed. RESULTS: Adapted materials increased time spent on educational content and were associated with small improvements in selected comprehension outcomes, though effects were often not statistically significant against the co-created comparator. Self-check questions revealed considerable comprehension gaps regardless of condition, underscoring that co-creation and pre-testing alone do not guarantee sufficient respondent comprehension. Educational materials also emerged as a meaningful source of selective dropout in all surveys, predominantly among respondents with lower education levels, posing a risk to sample representativeness that warrants attention in future research. DISCUSSION: Adapting DCE educational materials based on educational theory and instructional design principles offers a promising approach to improving respondent engagement and understanding. To enable cumulative learning, we further encourage researchers to report comprehension outcomes and publish educational materials as supplementary materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Patient
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-026-00850-1
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational Materials for Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Theory-Driven Approach

Esther Wilhelmina de Bekker-Grob, Huib K. Tabbers, Stella Maria Marceta, Jorien Veldwijk et al.
Patient
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Educational Materials for Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Theory-Driven Approach

Esther Wilhelmina de Bekker-Grob, Huib K. Tabbers, Stella Maria Marceta, Jorien Veldwijk, Bjorn Benny de Koning, Marie; id_orcid 0000-0001-5928-486X Falahee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To make informed choices in health-related discrete choice experiments (DCEs), respondents need to understand the choice scenarios, alternatives, attributes and attribute levels presented to them. Respondent populations are often highly diverse in knowledge and experience, leading to varying informational needs that make it challenging to design educational materials that sufficiently inform all respondents without disengaging others. At present, however, structured guidance on developing DCE educational materials is lacking. Drawing on the instructional design literature, this paper investigates whether theory-driven adaptations to educational materials improve respondent comprehension and engagement in health-related DCEs. METHODS: Informed by three focus groups on DCE informational needs, we identified four design principles from the instructional design literature relevant to DCE educational materials: whole-task instruction, making inferences explicit, adapting information to respondents' prior knowledge and embedding self-check questions with corrective feedback. Educational materials for three existing DCEs (influenza vaccination, colorectal cancer screening and rheumatoid arthritis prevention) were redesigned to incorporate these principles. Panel respondents (N = 1754) were randomized to receive either the original or the adapted educational materials, and effects on comprehension, engagement, internal validity and choice consistency were assessed. RESULTS: Adapted materials increased time spent on educational content and were associated with small improvements in selected comprehension outcomes, though effects were often not statistically significant against the co-created comparator. Self-check questions revealed considerable comprehension gaps regardless of condition, underscoring that co-creation and pre-testing alone do not guarantee sufficient respondent comprehension. Educational materials also emerged as a meaningful source of selective dropout in all surveys, predominantly among respondents with lower education levels, posing a risk to sample representativeness that warrants attention in future research. DISCUSSION: Adapting DCE educational materials based on educational theory and instructional design principles offers a promising approach to improving respondent engagement and understanding. To enable cumulative learning, we further encourage researchers to report comprehension outcomes and publish educational materials as supplementary materials.

Patient
University of Southampton (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Arthritis Research UK, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Quality education, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.