Legal Fragmentation and Teacher Protection in South African Inclusive Education Classrooms: A Critical Document Analysis

Inclusive education in South Africa is based on constitutional rights to equality, dignity, and basic education, with teachers as key implementers. However, teacher responsibilities are clearly defined, but the legal protections supporting these duties are fragmented across various frameworks. This study examines the extent to which South African legal and policy instruments protect teachers as rights-bearing professionals in inclusive education. This study is guided by a qualitative research approach within a critical interpretivist paradigm. A qualitative critical document analysis was conducted across constitutional provisions, including sections 10 (dignity), 22 (freedom of profession), and 23 (fair labor practices), together with legislation, education policies, professional regulations, and international rights instruments. The study reveals that South African teachers bear significant responsibilities for inclusive education, but the legal protections they have are inconsistent across constitutional, labor, professional, and policy frameworks. This tension is most pronounced when teachers support learners with undiagnosed learning difficulties, where institutional safeguards are limited and responsibility risks becoming individualized. The study affirms that teacher protection is not separate from learner rights but forms part of the institutional conditions necessary for inclusive education to succeed. It demonstrates that safeguarding teachers' dignity, safety, and professional agency is essential to ensuring that learners' rights to participation and support are meaningfully realized. Teacher protection should not be treated as a peripheral employment issue but as a substantive component of inclusive education, necessary for lawful, safe, and effective implementation. This study contributes to international rights scholarship by reframing the argument that protecting teachers' rights is critical to ensuring learners' rights to participation and equality in inclusive education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies
Published
2026-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.66074/f1m4q9t7h
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Fragmentation and Teacher Protection in South African Inclusive Education Classrooms: A Critical Document Analysis

Mohamed Mosala, Siboniso John Selepe
International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

Legal Fragmentation and Teacher Protection in South African Inclusive Education Classrooms: A Critical Document Analysis

Mohamed Mosala, Siboniso John Selepe
article en

Abstract

Inclusive education in South Africa is based on constitutional rights to equality, dignity, and basic education, with teachers as key implementers. However, teacher responsibilities are clearly defined, but the legal protections supporting these duties are fragmented across various frameworks. This study examines the extent to which South African legal and policy instruments protect teachers as rights-bearing professionals in inclusive education. This study is guided by a qualitative research approach within a critical interpretivist paradigm. A qualitative critical document analysis was conducted across constitutional provisions, including sections 10 (dignity), 22 (freedom of profession), and 23 (fair labor practices), together with legislation, education policies, professional regulations, and international rights instruments. The study reveals that South African teachers bear significant responsibilities for inclusive education, but the legal protections they have are inconsistent across constitutional, labor, professional, and policy frameworks. This tension is most pronounced when teachers support learners with undiagnosed learning difficulties, where institutional safeguards are limited and responsibility risks becoming individualized. The study affirms that teacher protection is not separate from learner rights but forms part of the institutional conditions necessary for inclusive education to succeed. It demonstrates that safeguarding teachers' dignity, safety, and professional agency is essential to ensuring that learners' rights to participation and support are meaningfully realized. Teacher protection should not be treated as a peripheral employment issue but as a substantive component of inclusive education, necessary for lawful, safe, and effective implementation. This study contributes to international rights scholarship by reframing the argument that protecting teachers' rights is critical to ensuring learners' rights to participation and equality in inclusive education.

International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary StudiesVol. 2(4)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.