A cross-sectional study of eating attitudes in Hong Kong athletes

Abstract Numerous studies have explored disordered eating (DE) in athletes, yet their findings frequently conflict. This research focused on examining the proportion at risk for DE among HK Chinese athletes. A sample of 100 athletes participated in the study, which employed a cross-sectional design using the EAT-26 questionnaire. The results revealed that the proportion at risk for DE was 4.0%, with female athletes at 7.1% compared to 1.7% in male athletes. Athletes with dieting experience scored higher on EAT-26 compared to athletes without (8.08 ± 9.03 vs. 4.92 ± 5.73, p < 0.05). Young athletes under the age of 19 showed significantly higher EAT-26 scores compared to those aged 19 and older (9.24 ± 11.21 vs. 5.33 ± 5.71, p < 0.05), and lower body image (BI < 5 out of 9) was associated with higher EAT-26 scores compared to higher body image (BI ≥ 5) (11.08 ± 7.88 vs. 5.41 ± 6.99, p < 0.01). Pearson’s correlation analysis demonstrated that age and EAT-26 scores showed a weak negative correlation ( r = -0.234, p < 0.05), while self-perceived BI had a moderate negative correlation with EAT-26 scores ( r = -0.344, p < 0.001). Multiple linear analysis identified age (β = -0.228 , p < 0.05 ) and self-perceived BI (β = -0.344 , p < 0.001 ) as negative predictors of EAT-26 scores. Results indicate higher EAT-26 scores among younger athletes and athletes who had previously attempted dieting methods, suggesting tailored health education programs and screening for different groups. Level of Evidence Level V, Descriptive Study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Psychology
Published
2026-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-026-00848-8
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-sectional study of eating attitudes in Hong Kong athletes

T Pun, Leo C.M. Cheung, James W.H. Sze, Sophia L.Y. Li et al.
Discover Psychology
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

A cross-sectional study of eating attitudes in Hong Kong athletes

T Pun, Leo C.M. Cheung, James W.H. Sze, Sophia L.Y. Li, John O'Reilly, Margaret Jip Kuo, Frankie P.L. Siu, Jade T.Y. Lau
article en

Abstract

Abstract Numerous studies have explored disordered eating (DE) in athletes, yet their findings frequently conflict. This research focused on examining the proportion at risk for DE among HK Chinese athletes. A sample of 100 athletes participated in the study, which employed a cross-sectional design using the EAT-26 questionnaire. The results revealed that the proportion at risk for DE was 4.0%, with female athletes at 7.1% compared to 1.7% in male athletes. Athletes with dieting experience scored higher on EAT-26 compared to athletes without (8.08 ± 9.03 vs. 4.92 ± 5.73, p < 0.05). Young athletes under the age of 19 showed significantly higher EAT-26 scores compared to those aged 19 and older (9.24 ± 11.21 vs. 5.33 ± 5.71, p < 0.05), and lower body image (BI < 5 out of 9) was associated with higher EAT-26 scores compared to higher body image (BI ≥ 5) (11.08 ± 7.88 vs. 5.41 ± 6.99, p < 0.01). Pearson’s correlation analysis demonstrated that age and EAT-26 scores showed a weak negative correlation ( r = -0.234, p < 0.05), while self-perceived BI had a moderate negative correlation with EAT-26 scores ( r = -0.344, p < 0.001). Multiple linear analysis identified age (β = -0.228 , p < 0.05 ) and self-perceived BI (β = -0.344 , p < 0.001 ) as negative predictors of EAT-26 scores. Results indicate higher EAT-26 scores among younger athletes and athletes who had previously attempted dieting methods, suggesting tailored health education programs and screening for different groups. Level of Evidence Level V, Descriptive Study.

Discover Psychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.