Multiobjective optimization of foamed concrete for sustainable construction using statistical and artificial intelligence approaches

Abstract Foamed concrete is lightweight and insulating, but its mix design is a headache. Strength, durability, and carbon footprint all fight each other. This review looks at how researchers have tried to optimize these trade-offs using methods like RSM, Taguchi, ANN, and genetic algorithms. RSM is easy to interpret but struggles with nonlinear foam behavior. AI models handle nonlinearity better but need lots of data and tell you nothing about why they work. The best path forward seems to be hybrid approaches. On the environmental side, cement drives most of the carbon. Replacing it with SCMs can cut GWP by 20–50%. We put together a conceptual Pareto front showing the sweet spot: 900–1200 kg/m³ density, 8–15 MPa strength, and 350–500 kg CO₂-eq/m³. Big gaps remain. No standard testing protocols. Pore-scale physics is missing from models. Almost nobody has coupled LCA with real optimization. Field validation is rare. We end with a research roadmap: hybrid frameworks, open databases, and proper microstructural inputs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Civil Engineering
Published
2026-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-026-00632-6
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiobjective optimization of foamed concrete for sustainable construction using statistical and artificial intelligence approaches

Subahar Mohan, N. Jegandurai, R. Amuthalakshmi
Discover Civil Engineering
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Multiobjective optimization of foamed concrete for sustainable construction using statistical and artificial intelligence approaches

Subahar Mohan, N. Jegandurai, R. Amuthalakshmi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Foamed concrete is lightweight and insulating, but its mix design is a headache. Strength, durability, and carbon footprint all fight each other. This review looks at how researchers have tried to optimize these trade-offs using methods like RSM, Taguchi, ANN, and genetic algorithms. RSM is easy to interpret but struggles with nonlinear foam behavior. AI models handle nonlinearity better but need lots of data and tell you nothing about why they work. The best path forward seems to be hybrid approaches. On the environmental side, cement drives most of the carbon. Replacing it with SCMs can cut GWP by 20–50%. We put together a conceptual Pareto front showing the sweet spot: 900–1200 kg/m³ density, 8–15 MPa strength, and 350–500 kg CO₂-eq/m³. Big gaps remain. No standard testing protocols. Pore-scale physics is missing from models. Almost nobody has coupled LCA with real optimization. Field validation is rare. We end with a research roadmap: hybrid frameworks, open databases, and proper microstructural inputs.

Discover Civil EngineeringVol. 3(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multiobjective optimization of foamed concrete for sustainable construction using statistical and artificial intelligence approaches — Subahar Mohan, N. Jegandurai, et al. · Discover Civil Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS