Feeling the body politic: Interoception as a mechanism of political stress resilience

Abstract Politics can substantially harm physical and mental health, especially in polarized contexts, making political polarization a major non‐medical cause of disease and suffering. We examined whether citizens can protect their health without undermining civic engagement. Across three studies with over 2000 participants during the 2022 U.S. midterms and 2024 presidential election, we show that interoceptive sensibility, that is, the ability to perceive and trust one's internal bodily signals, protects against politics' adverse health effects. Higher interoceptive sensibility consistently predicted lower emotional, physical, behavioral, and social health costs, controlling for political identity, demographics, and emotion regulation. During the charged 2024 election, it further predicted fewer negative emotions, more hope for the future, and less fear, particularly when their candidate lost. Interoceptive sensibility also correlated with political engagement and efficacy, suggesting it enhances rather than inhibits participation. Our findings highlight it as a promising trait for mitigating political stress without reducing civic involvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Psychology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70217
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeling the body politic: Interoception as a mechanism of political stress resilience

Mariana Von Mohr, Manos Tsakiris
Political Psychology
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Feeling the body politic: Interoception as a mechanism of political stress resilience

Mariana Von Mohr, Manos Tsakiris
article en

Abstract

Abstract Politics can substantially harm physical and mental health, especially in polarized contexts, making political polarization a major non‐medical cause of disease and suffering. We examined whether citizens can protect their health without undermining civic engagement. Across three studies with over 2000 participants during the 2022 U.S. midterms and 2024 presidential election, we show that interoceptive sensibility, that is, the ability to perceive and trust one's internal bodily signals, protects against politics' adverse health effects. Higher interoceptive sensibility consistently predicted lower emotional, physical, behavioral, and social health costs, controlling for political identity, demographics, and emotion regulation. During the charged 2024 election, it further predicted fewer negative emotions, more hope for the future, and less fear, particularly when their candidate lost. Interoceptive sensibility also correlated with political engagement and efficacy, suggesting it enhances rather than inhibits participation. Our findings highlight it as a promising trait for mitigating political stress without reducing civic involvement.

Political PsychologyVol. 47(6)
Royal Holloway University of London (GB), University of Kent (GB), School of Advanced Study (GB)
NOMIS Stiftung
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Feeling the body politic: Interoception as a mechanism of political stress resilience — Mariana Von Mohr, Manos Tsakiris · Political Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS