Exploratory empirical evaluation of the cyber-resistivity maturity and scoring framework (CRMSF): a multi-sector pilot study

Abstract Cybersecurity maturity models are widely used to assess and improve organizational security posture. However, many existing frameworks remain control-centric, static, and insufficiently adaptive to organizational scale and sector-specific constraints. These limitations are particularly evident in small and medium-sized enterprises and public-sector environments, where resource and governance challenges hinder effective implementation. The Cyber-Resistivity Maturity and Scoring Framework (CRMSF) is developed as a modular, scalable, and business-aligned framework that integrates maturity progression with explicit weighting, complexity, criticality, and benchmarking mechanisms. It combines technical and organizational practices within a unified self-assessment and scoring architecture designed to support risk-informed and actionable decision-making. This paper presents an initial empirical evaluation of CRMSF through a mixed-methods pilot study involving 26 cybersecurity professionals from multiple industry sectors. Data were collected through structured self-assessments across seven domains and twenty-four security categories, supplemented by surveys and expert interviews. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected to evaluate usability, completeness, and contextual relevance. Based on structured practitioner evaluations, the results indicate meaningful perceived relationships between cybersecurity and cyber-resilience domains and suggest that practitioners regarded the framework as supportive for prioritizing initiatives and informing strategic investment decisions, while complementing established standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. The findings suggest strong perceived coherence and practical applicability of the framework, while identifying opportunities for refinement and further evaluation of scalability. The results provide initial, exploratory evidence that CRMSF is perceived as supporting adaptive, context-aware cybersecurity maturity assessment aligned with strategic governance and operational realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Security
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-026-01329-8
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploratory empirical evaluation of the cyber-resistivity maturity and scoring framework (CRMSF): a multi-sector pilot study

Konstantinos Vavousis, Yianna Danidou, Costas Iordanou, Georgios Vardoulias et al.
International Journal of Information Security
Information and Cyber Security
article

Exploratory empirical evaluation of the cyber-resistivity maturity and scoring framework (CRMSF): a multi-sector pilot study

Konstantinos Vavousis, Yianna Danidou, Costas Iordanou, Georgios Vardoulias, Konstantinos Papachristofis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cybersecurity maturity models are widely used to assess and improve organizational security posture. However, many existing frameworks remain control-centric, static, and insufficiently adaptive to organizational scale and sector-specific constraints. These limitations are particularly evident in small and medium-sized enterprises and public-sector environments, where resource and governance challenges hinder effective implementation. The Cyber-Resistivity Maturity and Scoring Framework (CRMSF) is developed as a modular, scalable, and business-aligned framework that integrates maturity progression with explicit weighting, complexity, criticality, and benchmarking mechanisms. It combines technical and organizational practices within a unified self-assessment and scoring architecture designed to support risk-informed and actionable decision-making. This paper presents an initial empirical evaluation of CRMSF through a mixed-methods pilot study involving 26 cybersecurity professionals from multiple industry sectors. Data were collected through structured self-assessments across seven domains and twenty-four security categories, supplemented by surveys and expert interviews. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected to evaluate usability, completeness, and contextual relevance. Based on structured practitioner evaluations, the results indicate meaningful perceived relationships between cybersecurity and cyber-resilience domains and suggest that practitioners regarded the framework as supportive for prioritizing initiatives and informing strategic investment decisions, while complementing established standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. The findings suggest strong perceived coherence and practical applicability of the framework, while identifying opportunities for refinement and further evaluation of scalability. The results provide initial, exploratory evidence that CRMSF is perceived as supporting adaptive, context-aware cybersecurity maturity assessment aligned with strategic governance and operational realities.

International Journal of Information SecurityVol. 25(6)
Hellenic Naval Academy (GR), Cyprus University of Technology (CY), European University Cyprus (CY), The American College of Greece (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.