Artificial Intelligence Iterative Reconstruction in Multiphase Abdominopelvic CT: Added Value for Anatomic Evaluation of Uterine Artery

OBJECTIVE: To assess the anatomic evaluation performance of the uterine artery (UA) on routine multiphase abdominopelvic CT images, and to investigate whether artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR) can improve this performance to a level comparable to that on CTA images. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients who underwent multiphase abdominopelvic CT. Aarterial phase (AP) images were reconstructed with AIIR (group B) in addition to the routine hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) (group A). Another 50 patients who underwent routine abdominal aorta CTA were retrospectively identified, and their images were reconstructed with HIR (group C). The anatomic evaluation performance of UA in terms of the interpretability of origins, branching pattern, and lumen diameter was compared across the 3 image sets. The objective image quality was also compared. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (age 18 to 65 y) were investigated, and 300 UAs were evaluated (150 images × 2 UAs). Both group B and group C outperformed group A in terms of the proportion of UAs with identifiable origins (90% and 88% vs. 68%), classifiable branching pattern (89% and 87% vs. 71%), and totally measurable diameter (63% and 67% vs. 33%) (all P<0.017). No significant differences were found between groups B and C for any of these proportions (all P>0.017). The measured diameters exhibited excellent intraobserver agreement with ICC values of 0.90, 0.93, and 0.98 for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The UA attenuation was highest in group C, followed by group B and group A (all P<0.017). Group B exhibited the lowest noise in all scenarios (all P<0.017). No significant difference was found in the CNR of UA between group B and group C (all P>0.017). Sensitivity analysis excluding hypertensive patients confirmed the stability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic evaluation performance of UA on routine multiphase abdominopelvic CT images is suboptimal. However, when AIIR is applied, both the interpretability of anatomic features and the image quality of UA are comparable to those obtained with dedicated CTA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001933
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Iterative Reconstruction in Multiphase Abdominopelvic CT: Added Value for Anatomic Evaluation of Uterine Artery

Ting Meng, Qianqian Qu, Haiyang Geng, Kai Ying Deng et al.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Artificial Intelligence Iterative Reconstruction in Multiphase Abdominopelvic CT: Added Value for Anatomic Evaluation of Uterine Artery

Ting Meng, Qianqian Qu, Haiyang Geng, Kai Ying Deng, Zeng Qingshi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the anatomic evaluation performance of the uterine artery (UA) on routine multiphase abdominopelvic CT images, and to investigate whether artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR) can improve this performance to a level comparable to that on CTA images. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients who underwent multiphase abdominopelvic CT. Aarterial phase (AP) images were reconstructed with AIIR (group B) in addition to the routine hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) (group A). Another 50 patients who underwent routine abdominal aorta CTA were retrospectively identified, and their images were reconstructed with HIR (group C). The anatomic evaluation performance of UA in terms of the interpretability of origins, branching pattern, and lumen diameter was compared across the 3 image sets. The objective image quality was also compared. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (age 18 to 65 y) were investigated, and 300 UAs were evaluated (150 images × 2 UAs). Both group B and group C outperformed group A in terms of the proportion of UAs with identifiable origins (90% and 88% vs. 68%), classifiable branching pattern (89% and 87% vs. 71%), and totally measurable diameter (63% and 67% vs. 33%) (all P<0.017). No significant differences were found between groups B and C for any of these proportions (all P>0.017). The measured diameters exhibited excellent intraobserver agreement with ICC values of 0.90, 0.93, and 0.98 for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The UA attenuation was highest in group C, followed by group B and group A (all P<0.017). Group B exhibited the lowest noise in all scenarios (all P<0.017). No significant difference was found in the CNR of UA between group B and group C (all P>0.017). Sensitivity analysis excluding hypertensive patients confirmed the stability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic evaluation performance of UA on routine multiphase abdominopelvic CT images is suboptimal. However, when AIIR is applied, both the interpretability of anatomic features and the image quality of UA are comparable to those obtained with dedicated CTA.

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN), Shandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.