Impacts of thermal preference on thermal comfort and a grouping strategy for student dormitories

Differences in thermal preference among individuals lead to distinct thermal needs. Although previous studies have investigated comfortable temperatures in dormitory environments, few have considered the impact of thermal preference on thermal needs. This study collected data from 270 dormitories and 1054 questionnaires to investigate the neutral, desired, and comfort temperatures of students with three distinct thermal preferences. To further validate the findings, the thermal responses of 36 participants with varying thermal preferences were monitored in a climatic chamber. Results revealed substantial differences (>2 °C) in both neutral and desired temperatures across groups. The 90% acceptability comfort range derived from chamber experiments was slightly wider than that obtained from surveys; the intersection of the two was recommended as the optimal dormitory temperature range. For male students, the ranges were 23.67–25.68 °C (cool preference), 23.77–26.47 °C (neutral preference), and 26.15–30.12 °C (warm preference). For female students, the ranges were 24.91–26.30 °C, 25.04–27.03 °C, and 26.84–29.52 °C for the respective preferences. The study indicates that assigning students with cool and neutral preferences to the same dormitory, and those with warm preferences together in a separate dormitory, can better accommodate the differences in thermal needs caused by thermal preference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indoor and Built Environment
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326x261496035
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of thermal preference on thermal comfort and a grouping strategy for student dormitories

Haitang Liu, Lijuan Wang, Shu He, Yinhui Zhu et al.
Indoor and Built Environment
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Impacts of thermal preference on thermal comfort and a grouping strategy for student dormitories

Haitang Liu, Lijuan Wang, Shu He, Yinhui Zhu, Yiheng Wang
article en

Abstract

Differences in thermal preference among individuals lead to distinct thermal needs. Although previous studies have investigated comfortable temperatures in dormitory environments, few have considered the impact of thermal preference on thermal needs. This study collected data from 270 dormitories and 1054 questionnaires to investigate the neutral, desired, and comfort temperatures of students with three distinct thermal preferences. To further validate the findings, the thermal responses of 36 participants with varying thermal preferences were monitored in a climatic chamber. Results revealed substantial differences (>2 °C) in both neutral and desired temperatures across groups. The 90% acceptability comfort range derived from chamber experiments was slightly wider than that obtained from surveys; the intersection of the two was recommended as the optimal dormitory temperature range. For male students, the ranges were 23.67–25.68 °C (cool preference), 23.77–26.47 °C (neutral preference), and 26.15–30.12 °C (warm preference). For female students, the ranges were 24.91–26.30 °C, 25.04–27.03 °C, and 26.84–29.52 °C for the respective preferences. The study indicates that assigning students with cool and neutral preferences to the same dormitory, and those with warm preferences together in a separate dormitory, can better accommodate the differences in thermal needs caused by thermal preference.

Indoor and Built Environment
Xi'an Polytechnic University (CN), China Architecture Design & Research Group (China) (CN), China State Construction Engineering (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.