Assessing the FAIRness of survey data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

This study investigates the FAIRness (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) of survey data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. During the pandemic, surveys played a crucial role in capturing public attitudes and health-related behaviors, but researchers often faced a trade-off between rapid data collection and implementing high-quality survey designs. Using metadata from the “Survey Data Collection during the COVID-19 Pandemic” (SDCCP) project, which documents 717 surveys conducted in Germany, we assessed the FAIRness of surveys published with a persistent identifier or project website using the F-UJI assessment tool. Our results show substantial variation in FAIRness scores. Surveys can be divided into two groups, with one group achieving around 88.46% FAIRness and the other averaging around 65.38%. These differences are correlated with survey design. Surveys using fast and cost-efficient designs also exhibit lower FAIRness. The findings highlight that the trade-off between rapid data production and methodological rigor during the pandemic also affected the availability and reusability of survey data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358755
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the FAIRness of survey data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

Tobias Gummer, 陳姿安 Ko-hsuan Lu, Karolina von Glasenapp
PLoS ONE
Research Data Management Practices
article

Assessing the FAIRness of survey data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

Tobias Gummer, 陳姿安 Ko-hsuan Lu, Karolina von Glasenapp
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the FAIRness (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) of survey data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. During the pandemic, surveys played a crucial role in capturing public attitudes and health-related behaviors, but researchers often faced a trade-off between rapid data collection and implementing high-quality survey designs. Using metadata from the “Survey Data Collection during the COVID-19 Pandemic” (SDCCP) project, which documents 717 surveys conducted in Germany, we assessed the FAIRness of surveys published with a persistent identifier or project website using the F-UJI assessment tool. Our results show substantial variation in FAIRness scores. Surveys can be divided into two groups, with one group achieving around 88.46% FAIRness and the other averaging around 65.38%. These differences are correlated with survey design. Surveys using fast and cost-efficient designs also exhibit lower FAIRness. The findings highlight that the trade-off between rapid data production and methodological rigor during the pandemic also affected the availability and reusability of survey data.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
Heidelberg University (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE), Centre Max Weber (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing the FAIRness of survey data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany — Tobias Gummer, 陳姿安 Ko-hsuan Lu, et al. · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS