Reimagining Non-sharing Knowledge Behaviours: A Multi-theoretical Perspective

Knowledge-sharing research generally treats sharing as beneficial and withholding as a problem in organizational settings. This article challenges this distinction by examining the strategic, psychological and organizational conditions under which individuals choose not to share their knowledge. We conceptualize knowledge non-sharing as a context-dependent behaviour, drawing on conservation of resources, psychological ownership, social identity and self-determination theory to explain why individuals may choose to withhold knowledge. A stakeholder perspective reveals that the consequences of non-sharing are not uniform: protecting knowledge may benefit one actor while imposing costs on another. Our analysis reconceptualizes knowledge non-sharing as a strategic action and reveals tensions among stakeholder interests. It also suggests a need for research that considers how non-sharing develops across levels, over time and in different contexts. For leaders and decision-makers, this means understanding that knowledge sharing is not always the right answer. Effective governance also has to consider when knowledge has to be protected and whose interests are at stake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FIIB Business Review
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145261488273
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining Non-sharing Knowledge Behaviours: A Multi-theoretical Perspective

Amitabh Anand, Noémi Szilvia Lőrincz, Sridhara Murthy
FIIB Business Review
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Reimagining Non-sharing Knowledge Behaviours: A Multi-theoretical Perspective

Amitabh Anand, Noémi Szilvia Lőrincz, Sridhara Murthy
article en

Abstract

Knowledge-sharing research generally treats sharing as beneficial and withholding as a problem in organizational settings. This article challenges this distinction by examining the strategic, psychological and organizational conditions under which individuals choose not to share their knowledge. We conceptualize knowledge non-sharing as a context-dependent behaviour, drawing on conservation of resources, psychological ownership, social identity and self-determination theory to explain why individuals may choose to withhold knowledge. A stakeholder perspective reveals that the consequences of non-sharing are not uniform: protecting knowledge may benefit one actor while imposing costs on another. Our analysis reconceptualizes knowledge non-sharing as a strategic action and reveals tensions among stakeholder interests. It also suggests a need for research that considers how non-sharing develops across levels, over time and in different contexts. For leaders and decision-makers, this means understanding that knowledge sharing is not always the right answer. Effective governance also has to consider when knowledge has to be protected and whose interests are at stake.

FIIB Business Review
Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Excelia Business School (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.