ROLE OF DRAIN PLACEMENT AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard surgical treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease. However, the routine use of postoperative subhepatic drains remains controversial. Although drains are traditionally used to detect or evacuate postoperative bleeding and bile leakage, they may increase postoperative discomfort and prolong hospitalization. Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without postoperative drain placement, with particular emphasis on postoperative pain, operative duration, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Methods: This prospective comparative observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, MVAS Medical College, Basti, over one year (2025–2026). A total of 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included, with 50 patients managed with postoperative subhepatic drainage and 50 without drainage. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6, 24, and 48 hours, postoperative complications, and duration of hospital stay were evaluated. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using appropriate statistical tests, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean operative duration was significantly longer in the drain group than in the no-drain group (61.5 ± 12.1 vs. 55.7 ± 10.4 minutes; p=0.012). Postoperative pain was significantly higher in the drain group at 6 hours (5.8 ± 1.3 vs. 5.1 ± 1.2; p=0.006), 24 hours (4.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1; p<0.001), and 48 hours (3.2 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9; p<0.001). The overall postoperative complication rate was higher in the drain group (32.0% vs. 18.0%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.106). Mean hospital stay was significantly longer among patients with drains (2.3 ± 0.8 vs. 1.8 ± 0.6 days; p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in subhepatic collection, bile leak, wound infection, nausea/vomiting, or readmission. Conclusion: In this comparative study, postoperative drain placement following laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with increased postoperative pain, longer operative duration, and prolonged hospital stay, without a significant reduction in postoperative complications. Selective rather than routine drain placement may therefore be preferable when guided by specific intraoperative findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Clinical Medical Research
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23256781
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ROLE OF DRAIN PLACEMENT AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

Durgesh Kumar Pal, Ravi Verma, Vishwanath Pratap Singh
Advances in Clinical Medical Research
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

ROLE OF DRAIN PLACEMENT AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

Durgesh Kumar Pal, Ravi Verma, Vishwanath Pratap Singh
article en

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard surgical treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease. However, the routine use of postoperative subhepatic drains remains controversial. Although drains are traditionally used to detect or evacuate postoperative bleeding and bile leakage, they may increase postoperative discomfort and prolong hospitalization. Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without postoperative drain placement, with particular emphasis on postoperative pain, operative duration, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Methods: This prospective comparative observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, MVAS Medical College, Basti, over one year (2025–2026). A total of 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included, with 50 patients managed with postoperative subhepatic drainage and 50 without drainage. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6, 24, and 48 hours, postoperative complications, and duration of hospital stay were evaluated. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using appropriate statistical tests, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean operative duration was significantly longer in the drain group than in the no-drain group (61.5 ± 12.1 vs. 55.7 ± 10.4 minutes; p=0.012). Postoperative pain was significantly higher in the drain group at 6 hours (5.8 ± 1.3 vs. 5.1 ± 1.2; p=0.006), 24 hours (4.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1; p<0.001), and 48 hours (3.2 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9; p<0.001). The overall postoperative complication rate was higher in the drain group (32.0% vs. 18.0%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.106). Mean hospital stay was significantly longer among patients with drains (2.3 ± 0.8 vs. 1.8 ± 0.6 days; p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in subhepatic collection, bile leak, wound infection, nausea/vomiting, or readmission. Conclusion: In this comparative study, postoperative drain placement following laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with increased postoperative pain, longer operative duration, and prolonged hospital stay, without a significant reduction in postoperative complications. Selective rather than routine drain placement may therefore be preferable when guided by specific intraoperative findings.

Advances in Clinical Medical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.