Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization Myth, Memory, Women, and the Civilizational Voice of a Nation_ Part III Beyond East and West: The Missing Conversation

Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization Myth, Memory, Women, and the Civilizational Voice of a Nation Part III Beyond East and West: The Missing Conversation Introduction In the six-part series entitled "Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization," we begin with the problem of the world's uneven attention to different civilizational heritages. We then examine Iran as a "civilizational archive," enter the world of mythology and the Shahnameh, and from there explore questions of women, life and freedom, ethics, coexistence, and the connections between civilizations. As the series develops, it moves beyond the recovery of historical memory toward a broader question: how should Iran be situated within the larger intellectual and cultural conversation of humanity? An important point should be made at the outset: this series is not intended as a nationalist manifesto. Its purpose is not simply to claim that "Iran was a great civilization." The argument is broader: when a major civilizational tradition is excluded from, or significantly diminished within, the common narrative of human history, our understanding of humanity itself becomes incomplete. The primary inspiration for writing this series in English was a twenty-minute video by Dr. Shervin Vakili, published in Persian on October 6, 2026, under the title "Why Should We Not Ignore Myths?" In this video, Dr. Vakili addresses a series of important questions concerning the place of Iranian mythology among the world's mythological traditions. Why, when we speak of mythology, does the modern mind so often turn first to Greece and Rome? Is Iranian mythology merely one component of a cultural heritage, or can it be regarded as one of the world's significant and complex mythological traditions? The video is part of Dr. Vakili's masterclass "Heroes and Myths of Iran." It begins by examining the position of Iranian mythology among the world's mythological traditions and then raises a broader question: why might the study of Iranian myths matter for understanding many other narratives and cultural traditions? The discussion then moves toward a more fundamental question: In an age of science and technology, why should we still take myths seriously? How does myth differ from science? Do myths lose their relevance and function as scientific knowledge advances? Or do myth, science, and art engage with human experience, identity, ethics, beauty, and the meaning of life in fundamentally different ways? Among the subjects discussed in the video are: • the place of Iranian mythology in the world; • why Greek and Roman narratives should not be treated as the sole standard for understanding mythology; • the relationship between science, myth, and art; • the role of myth in the formation of identity; • why myths have survived despite the advance of science and technology; • and the role of the Shahnameh in understanding humanity, war, heroism, and chivalry. The present series begins from this point, but it does not end there. Its purpose is to extend the question of mythology into a larger inquiry concerning civilizational memory, the way human history is narrated, and Iran's place in the global intellectual conversation. In other words, the issue is not simply whether we should know more about the myths of Iran. The deeper question is this: What is missing from our understanding of humanity when a major civilizational archive is overlooked? ________________________________________ From Part II to Part III The second part of this series, "The Ethics of Civilization: Justice, Power, and the Human Condition," moved from the recovery of civilizational memory toward the ethical questions preserved within that memory. It explored themes of justice, power, responsibility, good and evil, kingship, and the human condition, asking why these ancient questions continue to matter in the modern world. The present part takes the next step. Having considered what Iranian civilizational memory contains, we now turn to a broader question: how should that memory enter the conversation of world civilization? Part III, "Beyond East and West: The Missing Conversation," therefore moves from civilizational ethics toward civilizational dialogue. It does not seek to replace one hierarchy with another, nor to argue that Iran should simply take the place once occupied by Greece or any other civilization at the center of the historical narrative. Instead, it asks whether the familiar opposition between East and West is itself too narrow to describe the actual history of human civilization. Civilizations have never developed in complete isolation. Ideas, peoples, languages, religions, technologies, institutions, stories, and artistic traditions have crossed borders for thousands of years. Iran has been one of the major geographical and cultural spaces in which such encounters took place. The question, therefore, is not simply whether Iran was "greater" than another civilization. The more important question is whether the history of humanity becomes poorer when one of its major civilizational archives is insufficiently heard. Part III consequently explores Iran not primarily as a rival to the West, but as a participant, intermediary, transmitter, and contributor to a much larger human conversation. The ultimate argument is simple: The return of a civilization to the global conversation does not require the return of an empire. What may return instead is a living intellectual presence: through language, literature, philosophy, ethics, art, scholarship, historical consciousness, scientific creativity, and the willingness to enter into genuine dialogue with other civilizations. The purpose is therefore not domination. It is participation. Previous Parts This article is the third part of the six-part series: Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization Myth, Memory, Women, and the Civilizational Voice of a Nation Readers who wish to follow the series from its beginning can access the two preceding parts through the platforms below. Part I: The Civilization We Forgot to Read Part I introduces the central question of the series: how the historical and cultural memory of Iran can be reconsidered as part of the broader archive of human civilization. The article is available on: • Humanities Commons • Academia Both versions contain the same Part I and are provided for readers who wish to begin the series from its starting point.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/479hw-x5d42
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization Myth, Memory, Women, and the Civilizational Voice of a Nation_ Part III Beyond East and West: The Missing Conversation

Alireza Assary
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Islamic Studies and History
preprint

Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization Myth, Memory, Women, and the Civilizational Voice of a Nation_ Part III Beyond East and West: The Missing Conversation

Alireza Assary
preprint en

Abstract

Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization Myth, Memory, Women, and the Civilizational Voice of a Nation Part III Beyond East and West: The Missing Conversation Introduction In the six-part series entitled "Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization," we begin with the problem of the world's uneven attention to different civilizational heritages. We then examine Iran as a "civilizational archive," enter the world of mythology and the Shahnameh, and from there explore questions of women, life and freedom, ethics, coexistence, and the connections between civilizations. As the series develops, it moves beyond the recovery of historical memory toward a broader question: how should Iran be situated within the larger intellectual and cultural conversation of humanity? An important point should be made at the outset: this series is not intended as a nationalist manifesto. Its purpose is not simply to claim that "Iran was a great civilization." The argument is broader: when a major civilizational tradition is excluded from, or significantly diminished within, the common narrative of human history, our understanding of humanity itself becomes incomplete. The primary inspiration for writing this series in English was a twenty-minute video by Dr. Shervin Vakili, published in Persian on October 6, 2026, under the title "Why Should We Not Ignore Myths?" In this video, Dr. Vakili addresses a series of important questions concerning the place of Iranian mythology among the world's mythological traditions. Why, when we speak of mythology, does the modern mind so often turn first to Greece and Rome? Is Iranian mythology merely one component of a cultural heritage, or can it be regarded as one of the world's significant and complex mythological traditions? The video is part of Dr. Vakili's masterclass "Heroes and Myths of Iran." It begins by examining the position of Iranian mythology among the world's mythological traditions and then raises a broader question: why might the study of Iranian myths matter for understanding many other narratives and cultural traditions? The discussion then moves toward a more fundamental question: In an age of science and technology, why should we still take myths seriously? How does myth differ from science? Do myths lose their relevance and function as scientific knowledge advances? Or do myth, science, and art engage with human experience, identity, ethics, beauty, and the meaning of life in fundamentally different ways? Among the subjects discussed in the video are: • the place of Iranian mythology in the world; • why Greek and Roman narratives should not be treated as the sole standard for understanding mythology; • the relationship between science, myth, and art; • the role of myth in the formation of identity; • why myths have survived despite the advance of science and technology; • and the role of the Shahnameh in understanding humanity, war, heroism, and chivalry. The present series begins from this point, but it does not end there. Its purpose is to extend the question of mythology into a larger inquiry concerning civilizational memory, the way human history is narrated, and Iran's place in the global intellectual conversation. In other words, the issue is not simply whether we should know more about the myths of Iran. The deeper question is this: What is missing from our understanding of humanity when a major civilizational archive is overlooked? ________________________________________ From Part II to Part III The second part of this series, "The Ethics of Civilization: Justice, Power, and the Human Condition," moved from the recovery of civilizational memory toward the ethical questions preserved within that memory. It explored themes of justice, power, responsibility, good and evil, kingship, and the human condition, asking why these ancient questions continue to matter in the modern world. The present part takes the next step. Having considered what Iranian civilizational memory contains, we now turn to a broader question: how should that memory enter the conversation of world civilization? Part III, "Beyond East and West: The Missing Conversation," therefore moves from civilizational ethics toward civilizational dialogue. It does not seek to replace one hierarchy with another, nor to argue that Iran should simply take the place once occupied by Greece or any other civilization at the center of the historical narrative. Instead, it asks whether the familiar opposition between East and West is itself too narrow to describe the actual history of human civilization. Civilizations have never developed in complete isolation. Ideas, peoples, languages, religions, technologies, institutions, stories, and artistic traditions have crossed borders for thousands of years. Iran has been one of the major geographical and cultural spaces in which such encounters took place. The question, therefore, is not simply whether Iran was "greater" than another civilization. The more important question is whether the history of humanity becomes poorer when one of its major civilizational archives is insufficiently heard. Part III consequently explores Iran not primarily as a rival to the West, but as a participant, intermediary, transmitter, and contributor to a much larger human conversation. The ultimate argument is simple: The return of a civilization to the global conversation does not require the return of an empire. What may return instead is a living intellectual presence: through language, literature, philosophy, ethics, art, scholarship, historical consciousness, scientific creativity, and the willingness to enter into genuine dialogue with other civilizations. The purpose is therefore not domination. It is participation. Previous Parts This article is the third part of the six-part series: Iran: A Forgotten Archive of Human Civilization Myth, Memory, Women, and the Civilizational Voice of a Nation Readers who wish to follow the series from its beginning can access the two preceding parts through the platforms below. Part I: The Civilization We Forgot to Read Part I introduces the central question of the series: how the historical and cultural memory of Iran can be reconsidered as part of the broader archive of human civilization. The article is available on: • Humanities Commons • Academia Both versions contain the same Part I and are provided for readers who wish to begin the series from its starting point.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.