Sourcing in or sourcing out? Diverging migrant labour regimes and use of temporary labour in the Dutch and Austrian food industries

This article contributes to a better understanding of industrial relations dynamics driving cross-country differences in the expansion and containment of precarious migrant labour, by investigating the role of industrial relations actors, labour market regulations and collective bargaining specifically. It compares the differential reliance on temporary and migrant labour in the food (and meat) sectors in the Netherlands and Austria, two countries with a strong corporatist industrial relations tradition. The analysis draws on desk research and interviews with trade union representatives, inspectors, employers, works councillors and migrant workers. The findings highlight the importance of regulations regarding flexible employment, the strength of sectoral industrial relations institutions and collective bargaining, and enforcement mechanisms at the workplace to explain different outcomes for migrant workers: namely, a sectoral migrant labour regime that enables an extensive and exploitative use of temporary migrant labour in the Dutch food sector but a limited one in the Austrian food sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Industrial Relations
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801261494469
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sourcing in or sourcing out? Diverging migrant labour regimes and use of temporary labour in the Dutch and Austrian food industries

Sonila Danaj, Nikko Bilitza, Lisa Berntsen, Paul de Beer
European Journal of Industrial Relations
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Sourcing in or sourcing out? Diverging migrant labour regimes and use of temporary labour in the Dutch and Austrian food industries

Sonila Danaj, Nikko Bilitza, Lisa Berntsen, Paul de Beer
article en

Abstract

This article contributes to a better understanding of industrial relations dynamics driving cross-country differences in the expansion and containment of precarious migrant labour, by investigating the role of industrial relations actors, labour market regulations and collective bargaining specifically. It compares the differential reliance on temporary and migrant labour in the food (and meat) sectors in the Netherlands and Austria, two countries with a strong corporatist industrial relations tradition. The analysis draws on desk research and interviews with trade union representatives, inspectors, employers, works councillors and migrant workers. The findings highlight the importance of regulations regarding flexible employment, the strength of sectoral industrial relations institutions and collective bargaining, and enforcement mechanisms at the workplace to explain different outcomes for migrant workers: namely, a sectoral migrant labour regime that enables an extensive and exploitative use of temporary migrant labour in the Dutch food sector but a limited one in the Austrian food sector.

European Journal of Industrial Relations
Tilburg University (NL), European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research (AT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.