Aristotle on Perceptual Delay

Abstract Aristotle records cases of perceptual delay (a trireme’s oars raised before their sound reaches the shore) but does not see what they cost his theory of perception. Three of his commitments cannot all be maintained: that perception is of what is temporally present, that perceptible qualities are inseparable from their substances, and that perception requires a medium rather than direct contact. Two are ruled out; only Temporal Presence is open to revision. The revised principle, Causal Presence, holds that we perceive what was present when the process began, provided the medium’s current state is the proximate cause. The mechanism draws on a distinction in Physics 3.3, not previously applied to perceptual delay, between an actuality that belongs to one subject but occurs in another. The actuality of being perceived belongs to the object but occurs in the perceiver; the argument holds even where the perceived object no longer exists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2026-0122
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aristotle on Perceptual Delay

Douglas Young
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Aristotle on Perceptual Delay

Douglas Young
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aristotle records cases of perceptual delay (a trireme’s oars raised before their sound reaches the shore) but does not see what they cost his theory of perception. Three of his commitments cannot all be maintained: that perception is of what is temporally present, that perceptible qualities are inseparable from their substances, and that perception requires a medium rather than direct contact. Two are ruled out; only Temporal Presence is open to revision. The revised principle, Causal Presence, holds that we perceive what was present when the process began, provided the medium’s current state is the proximate cause. The mechanism draws on a distinction in Physics 3.3, not previously applied to perceptual delay, between an actuality that belongs to one subject but occurs in another. The actuality of being perceived belongs to the object but occurs in the perceiver; the argument holds even where the perceived object no longer exists.

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Lycoming College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.