The Cyborg, the Muse, and the Des[ai]gner: A Generative Praxis for a Symbiotic Future

The incorporation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) poses a significant challenge to qualitative research, potentially relegating researchers to mere “end users” ensnared by the gravitational pull of technological determinism and neoliberal efficiency. This article dismisses instrumental “how-to” guides and promotes a “how-else”: a generative, critical, and innovative praxis. We tackle the philosophical, methodological, and ethical dimensions of this emerging landscape by formulating three interrelated concepts. First, the Everyday Cyborg repositions the researcher as an already entangled, hybrid subject. Second, Multimodal Critical Des[ai]gn (MCD[ai]) offers a methodological framework for “critique through creation.” Third, the Digital Muse frames AI as a “collaborative provocateur” demanding an ethic of “equity and justice by design.” This article employs a performative, dia-ethnographic approach to transition the qualitative researcher from a passive observer to a “critical designer” and “critical futurist.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004261489175
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cyborg, the Muse, and the Des[ai]gner: A Generative Praxis for a Symbiotic Future

Raúl Alberto Mora, Polina Golovátina‐Mora
Qualitative Inquiry
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

The Cyborg, the Muse, and the Des[ai]gner: A Generative Praxis for a Symbiotic Future

Raúl Alberto Mora, Polina Golovátina‐Mora
article en

Abstract

The incorporation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) poses a significant challenge to qualitative research, potentially relegating researchers to mere “end users” ensnared by the gravitational pull of technological determinism and neoliberal efficiency. This article dismisses instrumental “how-to” guides and promotes a “how-else”: a generative, critical, and innovative praxis. We tackle the philosophical, methodological, and ethical dimensions of this emerging landscape by formulating three interrelated concepts. First, the Everyday Cyborg repositions the researcher as an already entangled, hybrid subject. Second, Multimodal Critical Des[ai]gn (MCD[ai]) offers a methodological framework for “critique through creation.” Third, the Digital Muse frames AI as a “collaborative provocateur” demanding an ethic of “equity and justice by design.” This article employs a performative, dia-ethnographic approach to transition the qualitative researcher from a passive observer to a “critical designer” and “critical futurist.”

Qualitative Inquiry
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (CO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Cyborg, the Muse, and the Des[ai]gner: A Generative Praxis for a Symbiotic Future — Raúl Alberto Mora, Polina Golovátina‐Mora · Qualitative Inquiry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS