Enhancing engineering competencies through Outcome-based Education: A mixed-methods study in an intelligent control course

Bridging the gap between theory and practice remains a persistent challenge in engineering education, especially in complex, algorithm-heavy courses like intelligent control. In such contexts, students often know the abstract concepts but struggle to turn them into workable engineering solutions. Outcome-Based Education (OBE), which focuses on what students can do, offers a promising way forward. However, detailed evidence on how well OBE works at the individual course level in technically demanding fields is still limited. In this quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study, we redesigned an undergraduate intelligent control course around OBE principles, using constructive alignment together with project-based and case-based learning. We compared an intervention cohort (n = 97) with a historical control cohort (n = 89) who had taken the same course the previous year under traditional lectures. Quantitative results from pre- and post-course surveys, exams, and project scores showed meaningful gains for the intervention group across several areas: learning engagement (t = 9.87, p < .001, d = 1.28), practical application skills (t = 13.21, p < .001, d = 1.73), innovation abilities (t = 12.88, p < .001, d = 1.68), final exam scores (84.2 vs. 76.5, p < .001, d = 0.89), and perceived career relevance (t = 11.34, p < .001, d = 1.62). Student feedback further suggested that hands-on projects and regular feedback helped make abstract theories feel concrete and connected to real engineering work. Because we used a historical control group and changed several instructional elements simultaneously, these findings point to a strong positive association rather than definitive cause and effect. Even so, they suggest that a thoughtfully implemented, constructively aligned OBE reform can help build key competencies and bridge theory and practice in advanced science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358558
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing engineering competencies through Outcome-based Education: A mixed-methods study in an intelligent control course

Zhenqing Li, Yoshinori Yamaguchi, Jing Yang
PLoS ONE
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Enhancing engineering competencies through Outcome-based Education: A mixed-methods study in an intelligent control course

Zhenqing Li, Yoshinori Yamaguchi, Jing Yang
article en

Abstract

Bridging the gap between theory and practice remains a persistent challenge in engineering education, especially in complex, algorithm-heavy courses like intelligent control. In such contexts, students often know the abstract concepts but struggle to turn them into workable engineering solutions. Outcome-Based Education (OBE), which focuses on what students can do, offers a promising way forward. However, detailed evidence on how well OBE works at the individual course level in technically demanding fields is still limited. In this quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study, we redesigned an undergraduate intelligent control course around OBE principles, using constructive alignment together with project-based and case-based learning. We compared an intervention cohort (n = 97) with a historical control cohort (n = 89) who had taken the same course the previous year under traditional lectures. Quantitative results from pre- and post-course surveys, exams, and project scores showed meaningful gains for the intervention group across several areas: learning engagement (t = 9.87, p < .001, d = 1.28), practical application skills (t = 13.21, p < .001, d = 1.73), innovation abilities (t = 12.88, p < .001, d = 1.68), final exam scores (84.2 vs. 76.5, p < .001, d = 0.89), and perceived career relevance (t = 11.34, p < .001, d = 1.62). Student feedback further suggested that hands-on projects and regular feedback helped make abstract theories feel concrete and connected to real engineering work. Because we used a historical control group and changed several instructional elements simultaneously, these findings point to a strong positive association rather than definitive cause and effect. Even so, they suggest that a thoughtfully implemented, constructively aligned OBE reform can help build key competencies and bridge theory and practice in advanced science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Waseda University (JP), Anhui Sanlian University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.