Two Measures, Same Outcome: Comparable Associations Between Exposure Measurements and Language Performance in Bilinguals With and Without Developmental Language Disorder

PURPOSE: Language exposure is associated with language performance in bilinguals. Two common ways of measuring language exposure are total hours of exposure and percentage of exposure. This study compared differences in these two methods and examined their associations with bilingual language performance. Differences between typically developing (TD) children and those with developmental language disorder (DLD) were also analyzed across exposure measures and language performance. METHOD: Participants were 1,397 Spanish-English bilingual preschool children (73 identified with DLD). Caregivers reported hour-by-hour language input and output for a typical weekday and a typical weekend. Children's bilingual language performance was measured using a standardized language screener. Correlation and effect size analyses were calculated. RESULTS: Percentage and total hours of exposure were strongly and significantly correlated for both Spanish and English. Both measures showed moderate, significant correlations with bilingual language performance, with minimal differences in effect sizes. Significant group differences emerged between TD and DLD children, with small-to-medium effect sizes. The DLD group showed significantly weaker correlations between language exposure measures and language performance compared to the TD group. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that both measurement methods are statistically comparable, suggesting that clinicians may use either method to assess language exposure in bilinguals. The weaker correlations observed in the DLD group imply that additional factors beyond exposure influence their bilingual language performance and should be considered in evaluation. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34024479.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_ajslp-25-00371
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Measures, Same Outcome: Comparable Associations Between Exposure Measurements and Language Performance in Bilinguals With and Without Developmental Language Disorder

Mariana Gomez, Joseph Hin Yan Lam, Elizabeth D. Peña, Lisa M. Bedore et al.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Language Development and Disorders
article

Two Measures, Same Outcome: Comparable Associations Between Exposure Measurements and Language Performance in Bilinguals With and Without Developmental Language Disorder

Mariana Gomez, Joseph Hin Yan Lam, Elizabeth D. Peña, Lisa M. Bedore, Chengkai Yang, Annette V. Nguyen
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Language exposure is associated with language performance in bilinguals. Two common ways of measuring language exposure are total hours of exposure and percentage of exposure. This study compared differences in these two methods and examined their associations with bilingual language performance. Differences between typically developing (TD) children and those with developmental language disorder (DLD) were also analyzed across exposure measures and language performance. METHOD: Participants were 1,397 Spanish-English bilingual preschool children (73 identified with DLD). Caregivers reported hour-by-hour language input and output for a typical weekday and a typical weekend. Children's bilingual language performance was measured using a standardized language screener. Correlation and effect size analyses were calculated. RESULTS: Percentage and total hours of exposure were strongly and significantly correlated for both Spanish and English. Both measures showed moderate, significant correlations with bilingual language performance, with minimal differences in effect sizes. Significant group differences emerged between TD and DLD children, with small-to-medium effect sizes. The DLD group showed significantly weaker correlations between language exposure measures and language performance compared to the TD group. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that both measurement methods are statistically comparable, suggesting that clinicians may use either method to assess language exposure in bilinguals. The weaker correlations observed in the DLD group imply that additional factors beyond exposure influence their bilingual language performance and should be considered in evaluation. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34024479.

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
University of California, Irvine (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.