Component-Scale Relationships and Morphological Types of Traditional Mongolian Yurts in Inner Mongolia

Traditional Mongolian yurts in Inner Mongolia vary in wall height, roof inclination, and top profile, but whether these differences arise from stable component-scale relationships remains unclear. This study analyzes measured data from 41 traditional yurts, examines how component dimensions vary with yurt diameter, and classifies overall morphology using the relative heights of the wall, roof, and top. The results show that yurts do not enlarge isometrically: the toono and uni accommodate most horizontal expansion, khana height remains comparatively constrained, and the number of khana sections cannot independently indicate yurt size. Hierarchical clustering identifies four recurring types: moderate-wall–gentle-roof, high-wall–high-roof, high-neck–convex-top, and low-wall–high-roof. These findings explain how differentiated component scaling produces recurring whole-form configurations and provide a reproducible typological basis for measured documentation, digital reconstruction, conservation, and the selection of representative cases for building-performance research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16203985
Primary Topic
Architecture and Cultural Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Component-Scale Relationships and Morphological Types of Traditional Mongolian Yurts in Inner Mongolia

Deying Guo, Chunrong Meng
Buildings
Architecture and Cultural Influences
article

Component-Scale Relationships and Morphological Types of Traditional Mongolian Yurts in Inner Mongolia

Deying Guo, Chunrong Meng
article en

Abstract

Traditional Mongolian yurts in Inner Mongolia vary in wall height, roof inclination, and top profile, but whether these differences arise from stable component-scale relationships remains unclear. This study analyzes measured data from 41 traditional yurts, examines how component dimensions vary with yurt diameter, and classifies overall morphology using the relative heights of the wall, roof, and top. The results show that yurts do not enlarge isometrically: the toono and uni accommodate most horizontal expansion, khana height remains comparatively constrained, and the number of khana sections cannot independently indicate yurt size. Hierarchical clustering identifies four recurring types: moderate-wall–gentle-roof, high-wall–high-roof, high-neck–convex-top, and low-wall–high-roof. These findings explain how differentiated component scaling produces recurring whole-form configurations and provide a reproducible typological basis for measured documentation, digital reconstruction, conservation, and the selection of representative cases for building-performance research.

BuildingsVol. 16(20)
Inner Mongolia University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Architecture and Cultural Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.