Return to Running After Extracorporeal Magnetotransduction and Electromagnetic Shockwave Therapy for Bone Stress Injuries: A Retrospective Case Series

Bone stress injuries (BSIs) are overuse injuries to bone that account for substantial time lost for athletes who are training and competing. Each injury varies in healing time based on factors including the Female and Male Athlete Triad (Triad), anatomical location, injury severity, and chronicity. While focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been evaluated for management of BSIs, extracorporeal magnetotransduction therapy (EMTT) has been proposed to have synergistic effects. We evaluated return to running in athletes with BSIs treated with combined ESWT and EMTT. Retrospective chart review identified 46 athletes with 50 BSIs (29 female, 17 male; mean age 30.5 ± 13.2 years; body mass index 22.0 ± 2.8 kg/m2). Each athlete was comprehensively evaluated and provided individualized management of all risk factors identified, including Triad, anatomical location, MRI grade, and chronicity (acute < 3 months; delayed/nonunion ≥ 3 months). Each athlete elected to receive weekly to biweekly focused electromagnetic ESWT and EMTT (mean values: 4.8 sessions; ESWT, 3424 pulses/session, mean energy flux density 0.41 mJ/mm2; EMTT: 80 mT, 8 Hz, 7826 pulses/session). Additional ESWT/EMTT were based on factors including persistent pain during return-to-run progression. Most BSIs were high grade (n=35); Triad risk was moderate in 21 athletes and high in 6. Forty athletes (87%) returned to pain-free running. Return to run was defined as the start of a patient-reported pain-free return-to-run progression. Among 39 athletes with documented dates, this occurred sooner for acute than delayed/nonunion BSIs (12.9 ± 5.8 vs. 23.8 ± 12.1 weeks, p=0.002). Differences by injury grade (p=0.18), Triad risk (p=0.97), and anatomical classification (p=0.26) were not statistically significant, although subgroup sizes were small. While we recognize limitations related to study design and the population studied, our findings suggest the addition of ESWT/EMTT combined with comprehensive management of athletes with BSI may allow for a high rate of return to running.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13101176
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Return to Running After Extracorporeal Magnetotransduction and Electromagnetic Shockwave Therapy for Bone Stress Injuries: A Retrospective Case Series

Violet E Sullivan, Michelle M. Bruneau, Logan Walter Gaudette, Amol Saxena et al.
Bioengineering
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Return to Running After Extracorporeal Magnetotransduction and Electromagnetic Shockwave Therapy for Bone Stress Injuries: A Retrospective Case Series

Violet E Sullivan, Michelle M. Bruneau, Logan Walter Gaudette, Amol Saxena, Adam Sebastian Tenforde, Ryan L. Friedman
article en

Abstract

Bone stress injuries (BSIs) are overuse injuries to bone that account for substantial time lost for athletes who are training and competing. Each injury varies in healing time based on factors including the Female and Male Athlete Triad (Triad), anatomical location, injury severity, and chronicity. While focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been evaluated for management of BSIs, extracorporeal magnetotransduction therapy (EMTT) has been proposed to have synergistic effects. We evaluated return to running in athletes with BSIs treated with combined ESWT and EMTT. Retrospective chart review identified 46 athletes with 50 BSIs (29 female, 17 male; mean age 30.5 ± 13.2 years; body mass index 22.0 ± 2.8 kg/m2). Each athlete was comprehensively evaluated and provided individualized management of all risk factors identified, including Triad, anatomical location, MRI grade, and chronicity (acute < 3 months; delayed/nonunion ≥ 3 months). Each athlete elected to receive weekly to biweekly focused electromagnetic ESWT and EMTT (mean values: 4.8 sessions; ESWT, 3424 pulses/session, mean energy flux density 0.41 mJ/mm2; EMTT: 80 mT, 8 Hz, 7826 pulses/session). Additional ESWT/EMTT were based on factors including persistent pain during return-to-run progression. Most BSIs were high grade (n=35); Triad risk was moderate in 21 athletes and high in 6. Forty athletes (87%) returned to pain-free running. Return to run was defined as the start of a patient-reported pain-free return-to-run progression. Among 39 athletes with documented dates, this occurred sooner for acute than delayed/nonunion BSIs (12.9 ± 5.8 vs. 23.8 ± 12.1 weeks, p=0.002). Differences by injury grade (p=0.18), Triad risk (p=0.97), and anatomical classification (p=0.26) were not statistically significant, although subgroup sizes were small. While we recognize limitations related to study design and the population studied, our findings suggest the addition of ESWT/EMTT combined with comprehensive management of athletes with BSI may allow for a high rate of return to running.

BioengineeringVol. 13(10)
Harvard University (US), George Washington University (US), Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US), University College of Osteopathy (GB), Podiatry Institute (US), College of Podiatry (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.