Public Environmental Experience and Restorative Perception in a Mountain Tourism Village: Field Evidence from Residents and Tourists in Sanpo Town, China

Public-space experiences in mountain tourism villages involve environmental appraisal, bodily comfort, and place-related affect, but their associations with restorative perception require examination based on user feedback. Using Sanpo Town, China, as a case study, this study asks whether Local Environmental Perception (LEP), Perceived Microclimate Comfort (PMC), and Place Attachment (PA), operationalized as shared place-related affect, are distinguishable constructs; how they are associated with Restorative Perception (RP); and whether the findings are consistent across analytical methods and resident–tourist groups. An on-site non-probability survey conducted in May–June 2025 yielded 591 questionnaires from 300 residents and 291 tourists. Robust maximum-likelihood structural equation modeling was supplemented by ordinal-item analyses, coefficient-product decomposition, composite-score robustness checks, and exploratory group comparisons. LEP, PMC, and PA each retained a positive conditional association with RP, with standardized coefficients of 0.329, 0.259, and 0.202, respectively; the model explained 50.7% of the variance in RP. HTMT and alternative-model comparisons provided qualified support for distinguishing LEP from PMC, although their correlation slightly exceeded the square root of PMC’s average variance extracted. The latent-path comparisons did not detect clear resident–tourist differences under the present data and model specifications; this should not be interpreted as evidence of group equivalence. Familiarity-adjusted composite-score analyses retained positive associations, while a nominal group difference in the LEP–PMC path did not survive correction across six comparisons. The findings support a multidimensional evaluation of the experiences of users encountered in the surveyed public spaces. They do not establish causal design priorities, objective microclimatic performance, population representativeness, or measured recovery relative to a pre-exposure baseline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182010246
Primary Topic
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Environmental Experience and Restorative Perception in a Mountain Tourism Village: Field Evidence from Residents and Tourists in Sanpo Town, China

Ni Lin, Pengjun Wu, Deng Baohui, Bingnan Lu et al.
Sustainability
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
article

Public Environmental Experience and Restorative Perception in a Mountain Tourism Village: Field Evidence from Residents and Tourists in Sanpo Town, China

Ni Lin, Pengjun Wu, Deng Baohui, Bingnan Lu, Yike Hu
article en

Abstract

Public-space experiences in mountain tourism villages involve environmental appraisal, bodily comfort, and place-related affect, but their associations with restorative perception require examination based on user feedback. Using Sanpo Town, China, as a case study, this study asks whether Local Environmental Perception (LEP), Perceived Microclimate Comfort (PMC), and Place Attachment (PA), operationalized as shared place-related affect, are distinguishable constructs; how they are associated with Restorative Perception (RP); and whether the findings are consistent across analytical methods and resident–tourist groups. An on-site non-probability survey conducted in May–June 2025 yielded 591 questionnaires from 300 residents and 291 tourists. Robust maximum-likelihood structural equation modeling was supplemented by ordinal-item analyses, coefficient-product decomposition, composite-score robustness checks, and exploratory group comparisons. LEP, PMC, and PA each retained a positive conditional association with RP, with standardized coefficients of 0.329, 0.259, and 0.202, respectively; the model explained 50.7% of the variance in RP. HTMT and alternative-model comparisons provided qualified support for distinguishing LEP from PMC, although their correlation slightly exceeded the square root of PMC’s average variance extracted. The latent-path comparisons did not detect clear resident–tourist differences under the present data and model specifications; this should not be interpreted as evidence of group equivalence. Familiarity-adjusted composite-score analyses retained positive associations, while a nominal group difference in the LEP–PMC path did not survive correction across six comparisons. The findings support a multidimensional evaluation of the experiences of users encountered in the surveyed public spaces. They do not establish causal design priorities, objective microclimatic performance, population representativeness, or measured recovery relative to a pre-exposure baseline.

SustainabilityVol. 18(20)
Tianjin University (CN), Tarim University (CN), Shijiazhuang Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (CN), Hebei Academy of Sciences (CN), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.