The Shape of the Tax: Transaction Shifting at New York City's 2019 Transfer-Tax Notches and the Mortgage Recording Tax

New York's 2019 reform introduced seven buyer-paid transfer-tax notches. At the three thresholds with enough sales to study, recorded prices moved below the threshold, compared with sales at the same prices before the reform and with round prices that were never taxed. The USD 1 million notch, which the reform left unchanged, gives a further comparison. The responses across thresholds reject a proportional benchmark, but the markets at each threshold also differ, so this is not a rate experiment. If the extra sales below each threshold moved there from above it, buyers avoided USD 2–3 million in tax a year. Loan records also give a benchmark for the gross mortgage recording charge and a static costing of continuous replacement schedules. Neither exercise identifies who bears the tax or what the optimal tax would be. Files: the preprint, the supplemental appendix (unchanged since 2.6), the source archive and a short summary (paper_in_brief.md). The replication package is at 10.5281/zenodo.22880953. See revision_notes.md for earlier changes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23256513
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Shape of the Tax: Transaction Shifting at New York City's 2019 Transfer-Tax Notches and the Mortgage Recording Tax

Pablo Loschi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Housing Market and Economics
preprint

The Shape of the Tax: Transaction Shifting at New York City's 2019 Transfer-Tax Notches and the Mortgage Recording Tax

Pablo Loschi
preprint en

Abstract

New York's 2019 reform introduced seven buyer-paid transfer-tax notches. At the three thresholds with enough sales to study, recorded prices moved below the threshold, compared with sales at the same prices before the reform and with round prices that were never taxed. The USD 1 million notch, which the reform left unchanged, gives a further comparison. The responses across thresholds reject a proportional benchmark, but the markets at each threshold also differ, so this is not a rate experiment. If the extra sales below each threshold moved there from above it, buyers avoided USD 2–3 million in tax a year. Loan records also give a benchmark for the gross mortgage recording charge and a static costing of continuous replacement schedules. Neither exercise identifies who bears the tax or what the optimal tax would be. Files: the preprint, the supplemental appendix (unchanged since 2.6), the source archive and a short summary (paper_in_brief.md). The replication package is at 10.5281/zenodo.22880953. See revision_notes.md for earlier changes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.