Prevalence and impacts of breathlessness in South Africa: an exploratory, cross-sectional population study

Background: Chronic breathlessness contributes substantially to the global health burden and healthcare use, yet data on its prevalence and impacts in lower-resource settings remain limited. We investigated the prevalence, self-reported underlying conditions, and impacts of breathlessness at the population level in South Africa. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey in English among community-dwelling adults aged 18 years or older. The sample was stratified by age, sex, and rurality to reflect the 2022 National Census. Self-reported data included sociodemographic characteristics; breathlessness, assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale; employment; activities of daily living, assessed using an item from the London Chest Activities of Daily Living; quality of life, assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and EQ visual analogue scale; and disability, assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. We analysed the weighted dataset using descriptive statistics. Results: We included 2,828 respondents with a mean age of 37.1 years (standard deviation = 12.4), of whom 52.3% were female. Clinically important breathlessness (mMRC ≥ 2) was reported by 189 respondents (6.7%), with a median duration of 3.1 years (interquartile range = 1.5-5.4). The most commonly reported attributions were lung conditions other than tuberculosis (23.8%), 'other' factors (16.4%), and anaemia (11.6%). Clinically important breathlessness was associated with poorer perceived health, lower quality of life, and higher total disability scores than mild (mMRC 1) or no breathlessness (mMRC 0). Mobility and participation were the most affected disability domains. Among respondents with an mMRC≥2, 64 (33.8%) reported an impact on employment, of whom 49 (76.6%) had ceased full-time work, while 171 (90.3%) respondents reported an impact on daily activities. Conclusions: We estimate that more than four million people in South Africa live with clinically important breathlessness. The symptom is associated with poorer quality of life, greater disability, reduced employment, and impaired function. The life-changing effects of this debilitating symptom among community-dwelling adults should be investigated in longitudinal studies to help inform clinical policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Health
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.16.04229
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and impacts of breathlessness in South Africa: an exploratory, cross-sectional population study

David C. Currow, Joseph Clark, Vanessa Brunelli, Jacob Sandberg et al.
Journal of Global Health
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Prevalence and impacts of breathlessness in South Africa: an exploratory, cross-sectional population study

David C. Currow, Joseph Clark, Vanessa Brunelli, Jacob Sandberg, Irina Kinchin, Slavica Kochovska, R Van-Zyl Smit, Sungwon Chang, Magnus Ekström, Danny J Eckert
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic breathlessness contributes substantially to the global health burden and healthcare use, yet data on its prevalence and impacts in lower-resource settings remain limited. We investigated the prevalence, self-reported underlying conditions, and impacts of breathlessness at the population level in South Africa. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey in English among community-dwelling adults aged 18 years or older. The sample was stratified by age, sex, and rurality to reflect the 2022 National Census. Self-reported data included sociodemographic characteristics; breathlessness, assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale; employment; activities of daily living, assessed using an item from the London Chest Activities of Daily Living; quality of life, assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and EQ visual analogue scale; and disability, assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. We analysed the weighted dataset using descriptive statistics. Results: We included 2,828 respondents with a mean age of 37.1 years (standard deviation = 12.4), of whom 52.3% were female. Clinically important breathlessness (mMRC ≥ 2) was reported by 189 respondents (6.7%), with a median duration of 3.1 years (interquartile range = 1.5-5.4). The most commonly reported attributions were lung conditions other than tuberculosis (23.8%), 'other' factors (16.4%), and anaemia (11.6%). Clinically important breathlessness was associated with poorer perceived health, lower quality of life, and higher total disability scores than mild (mMRC 1) or no breathlessness (mMRC 0). Mobility and participation were the most affected disability domains. Among respondents with an mMRC≥2, 64 (33.8%) reported an impact on employment, of whom 49 (76.6%) had ceased full-time work, while 171 (90.3%) respondents reported an impact on daily activities. Conclusions: We estimate that more than four million people in South Africa live with clinically important breathlessness. The symptom is associated with poorer quality of life, greater disability, reduced employment, and impaired function. The life-changing effects of this debilitating symptom among community-dwelling adults should be investigated in longitudinal studies to help inform clinical policy and practice.

Journal of Global HealthVol. 16
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Cape Town (ZA), Flinders University (AU), Lund University (SE), University of Hull (GB), University of Wollongong (AU), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Groote Schuur Hospital (ZA), Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.