Validation of the Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score© to Assess Pediatric Patients’ Nursing Complexity

Background/Objectives: Aligning care delivery with patient needs is essential for the quality of care. As nursing needs vary in complexity, Nursing Patient Classification Systems (NPCSs) are critical to guide patient allocation to appropriate care settings. The “Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score©” (GPNS©) was developed to assess nursing complexity in pediatric inpatients. Following face and content validity testing, this study aimed to validate the GPNS© by assessing its inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity using clinical judgment as the reference standard, construct validity, completion time, and perceived ease of use. Methods: A prospective observational validation study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric teaching hospital. All pediatric patients (from birth to <18 years) admitted to the 17 low- and medium-intensity care units during the study period were included. Data were collected via digital forms by shift nurse pairs. Results: Overall, 389 nurses participated; 192 patients were assessed in pairs, yielding 814 valid forms. Inter-rater reliability was substantial (Cohen’s kappa = 0.785), whereas concurrent validity showed fair agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.300), with disagreements occurring predominantly between adjacent complexity levels (weighted Cohen’s kappa = 0.523). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) isolated a single latent variable, conceptualized as “nursing complexity”. The mean completion time was 1.8 min, with a 96.7% positive rating for perceived ease of use. Conclusions: Within its development setting, the GPNS© demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability, short completion time, and very high ease of use, with EFA providing evidence consistent with construct validity. However, both the fair concurrent validity and the paucity of patients classified within the high-complexity level were not sufficient to consider validation of the GPNS© as fully established. Further studies against an external criterion and on larger samples of high-complexity patients remain necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13101370
Primary Topic
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score© to Assess Pediatric Patients’ Nursing Complexity

Roberta Da Rin Della Mora, Stefano Parodi, Ilaria Artuso, Silvia Scelsi et al.
Children
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
article

Validation of the Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score© to Assess Pediatric Patients’ Nursing Complexity

Roberta Da Rin Della Mora, Stefano Parodi, Ilaria Artuso, Silvia Scelsi, Simona Calza, Giuseppe Caracciolo, Giulia Ottonello, Nicoletta Dasso, Silvia Rossi, Roberta Tirone
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Aligning care delivery with patient needs is essential for the quality of care. As nursing needs vary in complexity, Nursing Patient Classification Systems (NPCSs) are critical to guide patient allocation to appropriate care settings. The “Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score©” (GPNS©) was developed to assess nursing complexity in pediatric inpatients. Following face and content validity testing, this study aimed to validate the GPNS© by assessing its inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity using clinical judgment as the reference standard, construct validity, completion time, and perceived ease of use. Methods: A prospective observational validation study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric teaching hospital. All pediatric patients (from birth to <18 years) admitted to the 17 low- and medium-intensity care units during the study period were included. Data were collected via digital forms by shift nurse pairs. Results: Overall, 389 nurses participated; 192 patients were assessed in pairs, yielding 814 valid forms. Inter-rater reliability was substantial (Cohen’s kappa = 0.785), whereas concurrent validity showed fair agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.300), with disagreements occurring predominantly between adjacent complexity levels (weighted Cohen’s kappa = 0.523). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) isolated a single latent variable, conceptualized as “nursing complexity”. The mean completion time was 1.8 min, with a 96.7% positive rating for perceived ease of use. Conclusions: Within its development setting, the GPNS© demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability, short completion time, and very high ease of use, with EFA providing evidence consistent with construct validity. However, both the fair concurrent validity and the paucity of patients classified within the high-complexity level were not sufficient to consider validation of the GPNS© as fully established. Further studies against an external criterion and on larger samples of high-complexity patients remain necessary.

ChildrenVol. 13(10)
Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.