Meritocracy Divide

Abstract As a postscript to the collected articles in this forum, this article first discusses how and why a high-stakes test-based admissions system has historically been established in East Asia, contextualizing meritocratic educational selection within the historical experience of “catch-up modernization.” Second, using a theoretical framework of “compressed” modernity and development, it discusses how broader and more recent societal changes have contributed to the development of a high-stakes admissions system. Third, it discusses the implications of these recent changes in admissions for understanding changes in meritocracy. Finally, it describes the problems these rapid and simultaneous changes in admissions and other social spheres have created and what implications these changes have for our understanding of meritocracy in the region. It concludes by discussing how meritocracy has created a new social divide, representing a duality in meritocratic college admissions consisting of traditional high-stakes tests and newly introduced admissions procedures that are more holistic.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Asian Studies
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00219118-12603074
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meritocracy Divide

Takehiko Kariya
The Journal of Asian Studies
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
article

Meritocracy Divide

Takehiko Kariya
article en

Abstract

Abstract As a postscript to the collected articles in this forum, this article first discusses how and why a high-stakes test-based admissions system has historically been established in East Asia, contextualizing meritocratic educational selection within the historical experience of “catch-up modernization.” Second, using a theoretical framework of “compressed” modernity and development, it discusses how broader and more recent societal changes have contributed to the development of a high-stakes admissions system. Third, it discusses the implications of these recent changes in admissions for understanding changes in meritocracy. Finally, it describes the problems these rapid and simultaneous changes in admissions and other social spheres have created and what implications these changes have for our understanding of meritocracy in the region. It concludes by discussing how meritocracy has created a new social divide, representing a duality in meritocratic college admissions consisting of traditional high-stakes tests and newly introduced admissions procedures that are more holistic.

The Journal of Asian Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.