Hearing thresholds among dental professionals and students: early identification of occupational hearing loss using conventional and advanced audiological assessments

Abstract Dental professionals may exhibit early signs of hearing loss, particularly at high frequencies. Conventional audiometry (CA) may not detect the earliest cochlear changes, whereas extended high-frequency audiometry (EHFA) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) may identify early auditory alterations. In this study, we evaluated and compared auditory function between dental professionals and dental students using CA, EHFA, and DPOAEs. We recruited 74 participants, comprising 30 dental professionals and 44 dental students. We collected data using otoscopic examinations and audiological assessments in a sound-treated room. Dental professionals had significantly higher hearing thresholds than dental students at 1, 3, 6, and 8 kHz (all p < 0.05). EHFA demonstrated significantly elevated hearing thresholds across 9–16 kHz, while DPOAE amplitudes were significantly lower at most tested frequencies ( p < 0.05 at 11 of 13 frequencies), findings consistent with early noise-related cochlear dysfunction. Together, the CA, EHFA, and DPOAE findings indicate a pattern of hearing changes observed between dental professionals and dental students. These findings emphasise the importance of combining advanced audiological assessments with routine occupational hearing screening, particularly for dental professionals exposed to multiple sources of occupational noise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-74971-w
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hearing thresholds among dental professionals and students: early identification of occupational hearing loss using conventional and advanced audiological assessments

Wandee Khaimook, Ramida Dindamrongkul, Thitiworn Choosong, Sittichok Teawanan
Scientific Reports
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Hearing thresholds among dental professionals and students: early identification of occupational hearing loss using conventional and advanced audiological assessments

Wandee Khaimook, Ramida Dindamrongkul, Thitiworn Choosong, Sittichok Teawanan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Dental professionals may exhibit early signs of hearing loss, particularly at high frequencies. Conventional audiometry (CA) may not detect the earliest cochlear changes, whereas extended high-frequency audiometry (EHFA) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) may identify early auditory alterations. In this study, we evaluated and compared auditory function between dental professionals and dental students using CA, EHFA, and DPOAEs. We recruited 74 participants, comprising 30 dental professionals and 44 dental students. We collected data using otoscopic examinations and audiological assessments in a sound-treated room. Dental professionals had significantly higher hearing thresholds than dental students at 1, 3, 6, and 8 kHz (all p < 0.05). EHFA demonstrated significantly elevated hearing thresholds across 9–16 kHz, while DPOAE amplitudes were significantly lower at most tested frequencies ( p < 0.05 at 11 of 13 frequencies), findings consistent with early noise-related cochlear dysfunction. Together, the CA, EHFA, and DPOAE findings indicate a pattern of hearing changes observed between dental professionals and dental students. These findings emphasise the importance of combining advanced audiological assessments with routine occupational hearing screening, particularly for dental professionals exposed to multiple sources of occupational noise.

Scientific Reports
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.