Development of a climate-adaptive flood defence index to support planning and design decisions

ABSTRACT Climate change is increasing uncertainty in flood defence infrastructure (FDI) planning and design, challenging conventional approaches based on historical conditions and fixed design thresholds. This study develops a Climate-Adaptive Flood Defence Index (CAFDI) as a practical decision-support framework for assessing barriers and enabling conditions influencing climate-adaptive flood defence. The framework considers five dimensions: governance and policy, financial feasibility, technical capacity, stakeholder engagement, and hydro-physical conditions. Stakeholder assessment scores are integrated with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to calculate separate barrier (CAFDI-B) and enabler indices (CAFDI-E), while Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation (FSE) provides complementary dimension-level assessments. The framework is demonstrated using 92 stakeholder responses from Australia (41) and Vietnam (51), recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Using equal weighting across the five top-level dimensions, the Australian sample recorded barrier and enabler scores of 3.531 and 4.274, respectively, compared with 3.460 and 4.014 for the Vietnamese sample. Although both samples exhibited substantial barrier conditions and strong enabling conditions, they differed in their priority dimensions and decision determinants. The proposed framework provides a transparent and adaptable approach for diagnosing climate-adaptive flood defence priorities and supporting planning and design decisions across different institutional and environmental contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Practice & Technology
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2026.495
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a climate-adaptive flood defence index to support planning and design decisions

Bao Thach Nguyen
Water Practice & Technology
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Development of a climate-adaptive flood defence index to support planning and design decisions

Bao Thach Nguyen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Climate change is increasing uncertainty in flood defence infrastructure (FDI) planning and design, challenging conventional approaches based on historical conditions and fixed design thresholds. This study develops a Climate-Adaptive Flood Defence Index (CAFDI) as a practical decision-support framework for assessing barriers and enabling conditions influencing climate-adaptive flood defence. The framework considers five dimensions: governance and policy, financial feasibility, technical capacity, stakeholder engagement, and hydro-physical conditions. Stakeholder assessment scores are integrated with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to calculate separate barrier (CAFDI-B) and enabler indices (CAFDI-E), while Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation (FSE) provides complementary dimension-level assessments. The framework is demonstrated using 92 stakeholder responses from Australia (41) and Vietnam (51), recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Using equal weighting across the five top-level dimensions, the Australian sample recorded barrier and enabler scores of 3.531 and 4.274, respectively, compared with 3.460 and 4.014 for the Vietnamese sample. Although both samples exhibited substantial barrier conditions and strong enabling conditions, they differed in their priority dimensions and decision determinants. The proposed framework provides a transparent and adaptable approach for diagnosing climate-adaptive flood defence priorities and supporting planning and design decisions across different institutional and environmental contexts.

Water Practice & Technology
La Trobe University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.