Fairness in Round-Robin Tournaments with Four Players and Endogenous Sequences

We examine the effects of endogenous sequences on fairness in round-robin tournaments with four players, multiple prizes, and general contest technologies. A tournament is called horizontally ex-ante fair if symmetric contestants have the same expected payoffs when the tournament starts, independent from their position in the schedule. It is called perfectly fair if the winning probabilities in each match depend only on the players’ characteristics but not on the position of the match in the course of the tournament. We show that there is no sequence that implies perfect fairness. By contrast, some endogenous sequences imply horizontal ex-ante fairness irrespective of the prize structure. In winner-take-all tournaments, additional endogenous sequences are horizontally ex-ante fair. Our findings question the prevalent use of exogenous sequences in four-player round-robin tournaments in commercial sports despite the existence of horizontally ex-ante fair alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Economics
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025261486773
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness in Round-Robin Tournaments with Four Players and Endogenous Sequences

Marco Sahm, Fabian Dietz
Journal of Sports Economics
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Fairness in Round-Robin Tournaments with Four Players and Endogenous Sequences

Marco Sahm, Fabian Dietz
article en

Abstract

We examine the effects of endogenous sequences on fairness in round-robin tournaments with four players, multiple prizes, and general contest technologies. A tournament is called horizontally ex-ante fair if symmetric contestants have the same expected payoffs when the tournament starts, independent from their position in the schedule. It is called perfectly fair if the winning probabilities in each match depend only on the players’ characteristics but not on the position of the match in the course of the tournament. We show that there is no sequence that implies perfect fairness. By contrast, some endogenous sequences imply horizontal ex-ante fairness irrespective of the prize structure. In winner-take-all tournaments, additional endogenous sequences are horizontally ex-ante fair. Our findings question the prevalent use of exogenous sequences in four-player round-robin tournaments in commercial sports despite the existence of horizontally ex-ante fair alternatives.

Journal of Sports Economics
University of Bamberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fairness in Round-Robin Tournaments with Four Players and Endogenous Sequences — Marco Sahm, Fabian Dietz · Journal of Sports Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS