Multidimensional Factors and Predictors of Vulnerability and Frailty in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Background: Population ageing is characterized by rising multimorbidity and multifaceted vulnerability. While vulnerability is inherently a biopsychosocial state, clinical research predominantly operationalizes risk through physical frailty phenotypes, constraining holistic geriatric care. Identifying the interplay across biological, functional, and psychosocial domains is essential for comprehensive risk evaluation. Objectives: To synthesize multidimensional factors associated with vulnerability and frailty in adults aged ≥65, categorizing cross-sectional correlates and prospective longitudinal predictors to inform multidimensional assessment. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, systematic searches were conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (2020–2025). Independent reviewers performed screening, selection, extraction, and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal (PROSPERO: CRD420251039796). Results: Forty studies (22 cross-sectional, 17 cohort, 1 quasi-experimental) comprising 77,229 cumulative participant observations across community, outpatient, inpatient, and residential care settings were synthesized. Thirty-seven candidate determinants were mapped across five domains: biological/clinical, psychological, socioeconomic/relational, lifestyle, and self-care profile. Advanced age, multimorbidity, and polypharmacy were the most frequent clinical factors; prospective cohorts specifically linked high anticholinergic burden and functional dependence in complex activities to incident frailty. Depressive symptoms, cognitive decline, low education, financial strain, and social isolation consistently delineated vulnerable states. Conclusions: Vulnerability in older adults is a multifaceted construct requiring assessment tools that extend beyond isolated physical markers. Rather than a definitive feature set, these identified factors provide an evidence-based pool of candidate variables that may inform future risk-stratification and predictive modeling initiatives, supporting integrated, person-centered care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14203370
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidimensional Factors and Predictors of Vulnerability and Frailty in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Hélder Neto Pino, Anabela Pereira Coelho, Elisabete Alves, Cesar Joao Vicente da Fonseca et al.
Healthcare
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Multidimensional Factors and Predictors of Vulnerability and Frailty in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Hélder Neto Pino, Anabela Pereira Coelho, Elisabete Alves, Cesar Joao Vicente da Fonseca, Ana Ramos
article en

Abstract

Background: Population ageing is characterized by rising multimorbidity and multifaceted vulnerability. While vulnerability is inherently a biopsychosocial state, clinical research predominantly operationalizes risk through physical frailty phenotypes, constraining holistic geriatric care. Identifying the interplay across biological, functional, and psychosocial domains is essential for comprehensive risk evaluation. Objectives: To synthesize multidimensional factors associated with vulnerability and frailty in adults aged ≥65, categorizing cross-sectional correlates and prospective longitudinal predictors to inform multidimensional assessment. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, systematic searches were conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (2020–2025). Independent reviewers performed screening, selection, extraction, and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal (PROSPERO: CRD420251039796). Results: Forty studies (22 cross-sectional, 17 cohort, 1 quasi-experimental) comprising 77,229 cumulative participant observations across community, outpatient, inpatient, and residential care settings were synthesized. Thirty-seven candidate determinants were mapped across five domains: biological/clinical, psychological, socioeconomic/relational, lifestyle, and self-care profile. Advanced age, multimorbidity, and polypharmacy were the most frequent clinical factors; prospective cohorts specifically linked high anticholinergic burden and functional dependence in complex activities to incident frailty. Depressive symptoms, cognitive decline, low education, financial strain, and social isolation consistently delineated vulnerable states. Conclusions: Vulnerability in older adults is a multifaceted construct requiring assessment tools that extend beyond isolated physical markers. Rather than a definitive feature set, these identified factors provide an evidence-based pool of candidate variables that may inform future risk-stratification and predictive modeling initiatives, supporting integrated, person-centered care.

HealthcareVol. 14(20)
University of Évora (PT), Escola Superior de Enfermagem da Universidade de Lisboa (PT), Algarve Biomedical Center (PT), University of Algarve (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.